Cavendish v. Moffitt
| Decision Date | 10 April 1979 |
| Docket Number | No. 13795,13795 |
| Citation | 163 W.Va. 38,253 S.E.2d 558 |
| Parties | , 5 Media L. Rep. 1175 Carl L. CAVENDISH v. John MOFFITT and Greenbrier Daily Newspapers, Inc. |
| Court | West Virginia Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court
An action for libel is governed by the one-year limitation period established by W.Va.Code, 55-2-12(c).
Michael Clay Smith, Lewisburg, for appellant.
Amos Bolen, Andrew McClung, Lewisburg, for appellees.
In this appeal, the appellant, Carl L. Cavendish, raises the question of what is the appropriate statute of limitations for an action for libel in the State of West Virginia.
On February 10, 1975, the appellee, Moffitt, wrote and published in the West Virginia Daily News, a newspaper owned by Greenbrier Daily Newspapers, Inc., an article which Cavendish considered libelous.
On March 3, 1976, more than one year, but less than two years, after publication of the story, Cavendish filed a libel complaint against the appellees.
By order entered on June 29, 1976, the Circuit Court of Greenbrier County dismissed Cavendish's action on the ground that it was barred by the statute of limitations.
W.Va.Code, 55-2-12, provides:
"Every personal action for which no limitation is otherwise prescribed shall be brought: (a) Within two years next after the right to bring the same shall have accrued, if it be for damages to property; (b) within two years next after the right to bring the same shall have accrued if it be for damages for personal injuries; and (c) within one year next after the right to bring the same shall have accrued if it be for any other matter of such nature that, in case a party die, it could not have been brought at common law by or against his personal representative."
Because no section of the West Virginia Code specially establishes a limitation for libel actions, such actions are governed by the provisions of W.Va.Code, 55-2-12.
W.Va.Code, 55-2-12, as in effect at the times pertinent to this action, provided limitations for three classes of personal actions:
1. Damage to property (both real and personal);
2. Damage for personal injuries; and
3. All other personal actions which do not survive at common law. See, Snodgrass v. Sisson's Mobile Home Sales, Inc., W.Va., 244 S.E.2d 321 (1978).
It has been held that W.Va.Code, 55-2-12 must be read In pari materia with W.Va.Code, 55-7-8a. Snodgrass v. Sisson's Mobile Home Sales, Inc., supra.
W.Va.Code, 55-7-8a, provides, in part:
"(a) In addition to the causes of action which survive at common law, causes of action for injuries to property, real or personal, or injuries to the person and not resulting in death, or for deceit or fraud, also shall survive; and such actions may be brought notwithstanding the death of the person entitled to recover or the death of the person...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Slack v. Kanawha County Housing and Redevelopment Authority
...death of the injured party. Accord Rodgers v. Corporation of Harpers Ferry, 179 W.Va. 637, 371 S.E.2d 358 (1988); Cavendish v. Moffitt, 163 W.Va. 38, 253 S.E.2d 558 (1979). In Snodgrass, we "By isolating causes of action for fraud and deceit and combining them with personal actions which wi......
-
Jones v. George
...survivability ... such personal torts as defamation, false arrest and imprisonment, and malicious prosecution." Cavendish v. Moffitt, 253 S.E.2d 558, 559 (1979), citing Snodgrass v. Sisson's Mobile Home Sales, Inc., 244 S.E.2d 321, 325 (W.Va.1978). While the opining on survivability in Snod......
-
Horton v. Prof'l Bureau of Collections of Md., Inc.
...and Redevelopment Authority , 188 W.Va. 144, 423 S.E.2d 547 (1992) (finding invasion of privacy did not survive); Cavendish v. Moffitt , 163 W.Va. 38, 253 S.E.2d 558 (1979) (finding claim for libel does not survive); Snodgrass v. Sisson's Mobile Home Sales, Inc., 161 W.Va. 588, 244 S.E.2d 3......
-
Burdette v. FMC Corp.
...contends, are barred by the one-year statute of limitations set forth in W.Va.Code, § 55-2-12 held applicable by Cavendish v. Moffett, 253 S.E.2d 558 (W.Va.1979), while the post-termination statements are protected by the "justification" of truth provision contained in W.Va. Code, § With re......