Cement Corporation v. Dickinson, PENN-DIXIE

Decision Date24 November 1952
Docket NumberNo. 408,PENN-DIXIE,408
Citation344 U.S. 890,97 L.Ed. 689,73 S.Ct. 212
PartiesCEMENT CORPORATION, appellant, v. J. M. DICKINSON, Commissioner of Finance and Taxation of Tennessee et al
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Tennessee.

Mr. Charles C. Moore, for appellant.

Messrs. Roy H. Beeler, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Allison B. Humphreys, Solicitor General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.

To continue reading

Request your trial
42 cases
  • Brown v. Board of Education
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • May 17, 1954
  • United States v. Dawson
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • August 12, 1968
    ... ... for his personal benefit in a closely held publishing corporation, Cohoes Publishing Corporation, in a real estate holding corporation, ... ...
  • United States v. Pan American Mail Line, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • September 5, 1972
    ... ... and Cristobal, Canal Zone; that at all relevant times it was a corporation organized and existing under the laws of a foreign nation; that it ... 660, 662-663 (D.Del.1970); Miller v. Ideal Cement Co., 214 F.Supp. 717, 720 (D.Wyo.1963); Reading Co. v. Dexter-Carpenter ... ...
  • Brown v. Bd. of Educ. of Topeka
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • May 17, 1954
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • CHAPTER 3 TITLE EXAMINATION OF FEE LANDS
    • United States
    • FNREL - Special Institute Mineral Title Examination III (FNREL)
    • Invalid date
    ...Ayres v. Duprey, 27 Tex. 593 (1864). [16] Riverview State Bank v. Ernest, (CA 10 Kan.) 198 F2d 876, cert. den. 344 U.S. 892, 97 L.Ed. 690, 73 S.Ct. 212, 34 A.L.R. 2d 892; also see 26 A.L.R. 1546. [17] Philbrick, Limits of Record Search and therefore of Notice, 93 U. of Penn. L. Rev. 125 (19......
  • CHAPTER 2 CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE: A MULTI-STATE PERSPECTIVE
    • United States
    • FNREL - Special Institute Nuts & Bolts of Mineral Title Examination (FNREL)
    • Invalid date
    ...from the act have been replaced. Riverview Slate Bank v. Ernest, (CA 10 Kan.) 198 F2d 876, cert. den. 344 U.S. 892, 97 L.Ed. 690, 73 S.Ct. 212, 34 A.L.R. 2d 892; also see 26 A.L.R. 1546. Under a tract index system, "subsequent purchaser" means a subsequent purchaser of the same land. Under ......
  • CHAPTER 5 CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE--A MULTI-STATE PERSPECTIVE
    • United States
    • FNREL - Special Institute Mineral Title Examination (FNREL) 2012 Ed.
    • Invalid date
    ...from the act have been replaced. Riverview State Bank v. Ernest, (CA 10 Kan.) 198 F2d 876, cert. den. 344 U.S. 892, 97 L.Ed. 690, 73 S.Ct. 212, 34 A.L.R. 2d 892; also see 26 A.L.R. 1546. Under a tract index system, "subsequent purchaser" means a subsequent purchaser of the same land. Under ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT