Central Bank & Trust Co. v. Ford
Decision Date | 31 October 1912 |
Parties | CENTRAL BANK & TRUST CO. v. FORD. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Harris County; Wm. Masterson, Judge.
Action by the Central Bank & Trust Company against T. C. Ford. Judgment for plaintiff for a part only of several notes, and it appeals. Affirmed.
C. R. Wharton and T. H. Botts, both of Houston, for appellant. Ford & Beaty, of Jasper, and R. E. Crawford, of Houston, for appellee.
The Central Bank & Trust Company of Houston, a banking corporation, brought suit against the appellee, Ford, upon four promissory notes and for foreclosure of a deed of trust upon lots 8 and 9 in block 6 in the city of Houston, executed for the purpose of securing the said notes and any other indebtedness owing by the said Ford to the bank. One of the notes sued upon was in the sum of $4,800, dated December 12, 1909; one for $250, dated December 21, 1909; one for $300, dated January 8, 1910; and the other for $450, dated January 18, 1910. Upon trial before the court without a jury, judgment was rendered in favor of the bank for the amount of the three smaller notes, and in favor of the defendant on the $4,800 note, and denying foreclosure of the deed of trust.
Findings of fact and conclusions of law were filed by the trial court, as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Arp & Hammond Hardware Co. v. Hammond Packing Co.
... ... without consideration; Trust Co. v. Loan Co. 167 ... N.W. 785; Bentley v. Co., 184 P. 113; 10 Cyc ... Ry. Co. v. Carr, 157 P. 529; Bank v ... Halsey, 19 So. 522; Nisson v. Millen, 91 N.E ... 994; a note ... consideration is also void; Central Bank v. Ford, ... 152 S.W. 700; the conflicting nature of the evidence ... ...
-
Wilson v. Shear Co.
...Id., §§ 2245 and 2246, pp. 3477-3480; Goldstein v. Union Nat. Bank, 109 Tex. 555, 213 S. W. 584, 592, 593; Central Bank & Trust Co. v. Ford (Tex. Civ. App.) 152 S. W. 700, 704 (writ refused); Smith v. Wilson, 1 Tex. Civ. App. 115, 20 S. W. 1119, 1122, 1123; First Nat. Bank v. Burns, 88 Ohio......
-
Goldstein v. Union Nat. Bank
...That conclusion seems consonant with reason and justice and sound public policy; and it is supported by authority. Bank v. Ford (App.) 152 S. W. 700 (writ of error refused by this court); Bank v. Smith (App.) 22 S. W. 1056; Bank v. Electric Co., 142 Ky. 624, 134 S. W. 1156; Bank v. New Milf......
-
McFarland v. Shaw
...Central National Bank v. Lawson (Tex. Com. App.) 27 S.W.(2d) 125; King v. Wise (Tex. Com. App.) 282 S. W. 570; Central Bank & Trust Co. v. Ford (Tex. Civ. App.) 152 S. W. 700 (Writ Denied); Brady v. Cobbs (Tex. Civ. App.) 211 S. W. 802; First National Bank v. Jacobs, 85 W. Va. 653, 102 S. E......