Central of Georgia R. Co. v. Nash, 57005
Decision Date | 03 July 1979 |
Docket Number | No. 57005,57005 |
Citation | 256 S.E.2d 619,150 Ga.App. 68 |
Parties | CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. NASH. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Hull, Towill, Norman, Barrett & Johnson, Robert C. Norman, Neal W. Dickert, Augusta, for appellant.
Cooper, Cooper, Maioriello & Stalnaker, L. E. Maioriello, Augusta, Billy E. Moore, Columbus, for appellee.
Central of Georgia Railroad appeals from the trial court's overruling its motion for new trial, filed after a jury returned a verdict against it in the amount of $300,000. The appeal raises essentially three issues: that the amount of the verdict was excessive and was a product of jury prejudice; that the trial court improperly limited appellant's examination of certain witnesses; and that there was misconduct on part of the jury. We find no error and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Nash brought this suit to recover for personal injuries he suffered on February 2, 1976, while performing his duties as an employee of appellant. The injuries occurred when Nash, forty-one years old at the time, fell after grasping a defective grab iron on a railroad car. The grab iron was supposed to have supported Nash's weight, and, instead, it came off in his hand.
The evidence showed that prior to the fall Nash had been a very dependable worker and that since the fall he has been "much less active." Immediately after the fall, Nash's left knee began to swell. Fluid collected in the knee, and Nash had it drained. Nash has had continual medical treatment of the knee from the date of the accident until the date of trial, January 31, 1978. He entered the hospital on two occasions, and doctors performed surgery upon the knee both times, removing the prepatella bursa in the knee during one of the operations. The other operation was exploratory in nature, requiring the drilling of holes in the tibial plateau, and it resulted in a diagnosis of "chrondromalicia, lateral tibial plateau." During the course of his medical treatment Nash has been forced to wear knee pads and knee braces and to utilize crutches. Also, he has had to undergo substantial drug therapy. The fall also injured Nash's right knee; however, almost the entirety of the evidence on damages concerned the injury to the other knee.
Since the time of the fall Nash has endured continual, "excruciating" pain, and his condition is such that he can no longer perform the household chores and other work as he used to. A fellow employee testified that he had several times noticed tears form in Nash's eyes when he put his weight on the left knee. The muscles in the left knee atrophied because of the injury, and the evidence suggested that, at the time of trial Nash had regained only 80% Of his strength in the knee, which now makes a grinding noise when he walks. The evidence also indicated that the accident caused arthritis to develop in the knee and that because of the injury Nash has an increased susceptibility to severe arthritis. Because of the accident, Nash also has a greater chance than the normal person of having his knee wear out completely, in which event surgical removal of the entire knee joint could result. Nash was absent from work for a period of ten months, and his lost wages amounted to $12,726.58. Medical expenses prior to trial amounted to $2,779.10.
On appellant's motion for new trial, evidence was introduced which showed that just subsequent to the return of the verdict a tearful female juror embraced Nash's attorney and that other female jurors, as well as Nash and his wife, were weeping. Also on the motion for new trial, appellant introduced an affidavit of the jury foreman, which read in part as follows:
1. The evidence set out above...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Fidelity Nat. Bank v. Jeffrey M. Kneller, P.C., A89A0993
...on voir dire furnish a valid basis for reversal, such averments must be supported by evidence of probative value. Nash, supra, 150 Ga.App. at 72(3), 256 S.E.2d 619. Affidavits by fellow jurors do not meet this requirement. Pie Nationwide v. Prickett, 189 Ga.App. 77, 374 S.E.2d 837 (1988) [p......
-
Seaboard System R.R., Inc. v. Taylor
...565 F.2d 193, 197-198 (1st Cir.1977). The cases cited by the plaintiff do not require a contrary holding. In Central of Ga. R. Co. v. Nash, 150 Ga.App. 68, 256 S.E.2d 619 (1979), an award of $300,000 was upheld based on evidence that the plaintiff had required continual medical treatment fo......
-
Southern Ry. Co. v. Montgomery
...conscience of the jury. Atlanta Transit System v. Robinson, 134 Ga.App. 170(1) (213 SE2d 547) (1975)." Central of Ga. R. Co. v. Nash, 150 Ga.App. 68, 71(1), 256 SE2d 619. Plaintiff also testified as to the curtailment of activities such as hunting, fishing, riding horses, and playing with h......
-
Medoc Corp. v. Keel
...and flagrantly outrageous as to shock the moral sense; it must 'carry its death warrant upon its face.' Central of Ga. R. Co. v. Nash, 150 Ga.App. 68, 71, 256 S.E.2d 619 (1979)." Valdosta Housing Auth. v. Finnessee, 160 Ga.App. 552, 553, 287 S.E.2d 569 (1981). Considering all the circumstan......