Century Realty Co. v. Frankfort Marine A. & P. G. Ins. Co.

Decision Date02 December 1913
Citation179 Mo. App. 123,161 S.W. 624
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
PartiesCENTURY REALTY CO. v. FRANKFORT MARINE ACCIDENT & PLATE GLASS INS. CO. et al.

A policy insuring the owner of a building from liability for damages on account of the bodily injury or death of any person from accident in or about the premises of the assured limited the liability of the insurer as to any one person to $5,000. Subsequent clauses of the policy provided that, in case legal proceedings were taken on a claim against the assured, the insurer should at its own cost defend, and should have entire control of the defense, but if it should offer to pay the assured the full amount for which it is liable it should not be bound to defend, nor be liable for any costs or expenses which the assured might incur in defending, and that the insured should not, except at his own cost, settle any claim nor incur any expenses without the consent of the insurer. Held that, a judgment against the owner having been affirmed on appeal, the insurer, which conducted the defense and prosecuted the appeal, was liable, not only for the amount of the judgment, which was $5,000, but for the costs and the interest which, pending the appeal, accrued thereon, in accordance with Rev. St. 1909, § 7181, for interest is the compensation which is paid by a debtor for the detention of the debt, and, the insurer having delayed the payment, the interest must be considered as part of the costs and expenses; its liability not depending upon judgment first being rendered against the insured and payment made.

2. INSURANCE (§ 146) — CONTRACTS — CONSTRUCTION.

In case of ambiguity, a contract of insurance should be construed most strongly against the insurer.

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court; Eugene McQuillan, Judge.

Action by the Century Realty Company against the Frankfort Marine Accident & Plate Glass Insurance Company, of Frankfort-on-the-Main, Germany, and the Travelers' Insurance Company, of Hartford, Conn. From a judgment against the first-named defendant, it appeals. Affirmed.

On April 29, 1903, one May Travis Cooper sustained injuries from an accident in a passenger elevator located in the Century Building in the city of St. Louis, the elevator owned and operated by the Century Realty Company. She instituted action against that company to recover her damages, placing the amount at $25,000. The cause came on for trial and, on January 12, 1906, resulted in a verdict for her in the sum of $5,000, judgment following on that day for that amount and costs, the judgment to bear interest at the rate of 6 per cent per annum from that date. On motion for a new trial, filed by the Century Realty Company, defendant in that case, respondent here, the circuit court set aside the verdict and judgment and ordered a new trial. From this May Travis Cooper appealed to the Supreme Court. That court, on December 23, 1909, set aside the order of the circuit court granting a new trial and reversed the judgment with directions to the circuit court to reinstate the judgment as of date January 12, 1906, the judgment to bear interest from that date. See Cooper v. Century Realty Co., 224 Mo. 709, 123 S. W. 848. The mandate of the Supreme Court was thereafter filed in the circuit court, and on January 5, 1910, that court entered up judgment in favor of May Travis Cooper and against the Century Realty Company for $5,000, as of date January 12, 1906, that amount to bear interest at 6 per cent from that date, and also for costs and charges therein expended. Execution issued on this judgment under which, property of the Century Realty Company having been levied upon and advertised for sale, the Century Realty Company, on June 25, 1910, paid in satisfaction of the judgment the sum of $6,753.40 that amount made up of the $5,000 damages, $1,337.50 interest accruing from January 12, 1906, and $415.90 for court costs.

At the time the accident above referred to happened, the Century Realty Company held policies in two companies, both policies having first been issued in the name of the Century Building Company and others named, payable to them, "as their interests might appear," but afterwards, and before the happening of the accident, the Century Realty Company was substituted as the assured in place of the Century Building Company. Each of these policies covered the freight and passenger elevators situated in the building then owned by the Century Building Company, later by the Century Realty Company. For convenience and brevity, in speaking of the insured, we will designate it either as the Century Company, or as the Realty Company, although in the policies the former name, Century Building Company, is in fact used. It is conceded that the accident happened to May Travis Cooper while a passenger in one of the passenger elevators operated by that company in its building.

The policy issued by the Frankfort Marine Accident & Plate Glass Insurance Company, of Frankfort-on-the-Main, Germany, hereinafter called the Frankfort Company, being the appellant herein, is designated "General Liability Policy." By it that company, in consideration of a premium stated, agreed to indemnify the Century Company "against loss arising from legal liability for damages on account of bodily injury or death suffered by any person or persons whomsoever resulting from any and every accident of whatsoever nature or cause happening in, upon, or about the premises of the assured, or happening in, upon or about any of the seven passenger elevators and freight elevators, * * * or the machinery and appliances connected therewith and together comprising the elevator service, * * * but the liability of the company in respect to any one person suffering injury or death shall in no case exceed the sum of $5,000, nor shall the total liability of the company in respect to any one accident resulting in injury to or the death of several persons in any event exceed the sum of $10,000." It is expressly warranted and agreed: (1) * * * (2) That upon the occurrence of an accident, whether any claim be made in respect thereof or not, the assured shall give immediate notice in writing of the accident to the company and shall likewise give immediate notice of any legal proceedings instituted to enforce such claim.

"(3) That if any legal proceedings are taken to enforce a claim against the assured, covered by this policy, the company shall, at its own cost, undertake the defense of such legal proceedings in the name and on behalf of the assured and shall have the entire control of such defense. But if the company shall offer to pay to the assured the full amount for which the company is liable in respect to the claim sought to be enforced, it shall not be bound to defend any legal proceedings nor be liable for any costs or expenses which the assured may incur in defending the same. The assured at all times shall under the direction of the company, render all reasonable and necessary assistance to enable the company to effect settlements or to properly conduct a defense or to prosecute an appeal.

"(4) That the company may undertake at its own cost the settlement of any claim, duly reported to it as before provided, and the assured shall not, except at his (sic) own cost, settle any claim nor incur any expense without the consent of the company thereto previously given in writing; provided however that such immediate medical and surgical relief to the injured may be furnished as may be imperative at the time of the accident and reasonable expenses thus incurred shall be deemed a part of the liability of the company." (Italics ours.)

The policy of the Frankfort Company was dated June 7, 1902, was for a term of one year but was extended June 18, 1902, for a term of twelve months, the accident occurring within this second period.

The policy issued by the Travelers' Insurance Company, of Hartford, Conn., hereinafter referred to as the Travelers, or Travelers' Insurance Company, in consideration of premiums stated, agreed to indemnify the Century Company for a period of three years, beginning on the 11th of June, 1902, "against loss from common law or statute liability for damages on account of bodily injuries, fatal or non-fatal, accidentally suffered within the period of this policy, by any person or persons, while in the car of the elevator mentioned in said application, or in the elevator well or hoistway of same, or while entering upon or alighting from the car," and it is set out in the policy that, "in consideration of the rate of premium at which this policy is issued, it is hereby understood and agreed that other like and prior insurance shall be maintained by the assured in some other company, with like limits of liability, under said prior insurance, of $5,000 in respect to any one person and $10,000 in respect to any one accident causing injury to more than one person; and that this company shall only be held liable under this policy (subject to the limits of insurance therein made) for any loss sustained by the assured in excess of the amount covered by said prior insurance."

Among the conditions written in the policy and here involved, are, first, "the company's liability for an accident resulting to, or in the death of, one person is limited to $5,000."

(14) "No action shall lie against the company as respects any loss under this policy unless it shall be brought by the assured himself to reimburse him for loss actually sustained and paid by him in satisfaction of a judgment after trial of the issue. No such action shall lie unless brought within the period within which a claimant might sue the assured for damages unless at the expiration of such period, there is such an action pending against assured, in which case an action may be brought against the company by the assured within thirty days after final...

To continue reading

Request your trial
33 cases
  • Goerss v. Indemnity Co. of America
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • March 6, 1928
    ... ... Co., 208 Mo.App. 596; Conqueror Zinc & Lead Co. v. Ins. Co., 152 Mo.App. 332; Stag Mining ... Co. v. Mo. F. & ... Co., 209 S.W. 321; Realty Co. v ... Ins. Co., 179 Mo.App. 123; Most v. Ins. Co., ... State ex rel. v. Trimble, 297 ... Mo. 659; Century Realty Co. v. Ins. Co., 179 Mo.App ... 123; McManus v ... Ill. 251, 148 N.E. 12; Sanders v. Frankfort Marine, ... Accident & Plate Glass Ins. Co., 72 N.H. 485, ... ...
  • Battles v. United Railways Company of St. Louis
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • December 2, 1913
  • Fluor Corp. v. Superior Court of Orange Cnty.
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • August 20, 2015
    ...are determined; the liability being imposed by law at the time of the accident.”); Century Realty Co. v. Frankfort Marine Accident & Plate Glass Ins. Co. (1913) 179 Mo.App. 123, 161 S.W. 624, 630 (“the right of action of the assured did not depend upon judgment first being rendered against ......
  • Wehrhahn v. Ft. Dearborn Casualty Underwriters of Chicago, Ill.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • January 10, 1928
    ... ... Klotzbach v. Bull Dog Auto Fire Ins. Assn., 267 S.W ... 39; Conqueror Zinc & Lead Co. v ... Co. v. Frankfort Marine Accident & Plate Glass Co., 52 ... Wash. 124. (5) ... for loss by reason of payment of judgment. Century Realty ... Co. v. Insurance Co., 179 Mo.App. 123; ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT