Cerrato v. State, 90-1069

Citation16 Fla. L. Weekly 621,576 So.2d 351
Decision Date05 March 1991
Docket NumberNo. 90-1069,90-1069
Parties16 Fla. L. Weekly 621 Balmory Antonio CERRATO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtCourt of Appeal of Florida (US)

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg and Carol J.Y. Wilson, Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Jorge Espinosa, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUBBART, NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of conviction for attempted second-degree murder. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986). However, because the information did not charge the defendant with shooting the victim with a firearm, the trial court erred in reclassifying the offense from a second-degree felony to a first-degree felony and in imposing a three-year mandatory minimum sentence. See Sullivan v. State, 562 So.2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) (defendant's sentence could not be enhanced where information did not contain statutory elements necessary for enhancement); Cox v. State, 530 So.2d 464 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988) (enhancing offenses of battery on law enforcement officer to second-degree felonies and imposing three-year mandatory minimum sentence because of use of firearm was fundamental error, where defendant was not charged with possession of firearm under battery counts in information); Peck v. State, 425 So.2d 664 (Fla.2d DCA 1983) (in order to apply statutory three-year mandatory minimum, state must allege in the information and prove at trial that defendant possessed a firearm during commission of crime).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of conviction for attempted second-degree murder but reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing. On remand, the trial court must reclassify the offense to a second-degree felony and resentence the defendant under the guidelines using a new guidelines scoresheet.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Moritz v. Hoyt Enterprises, Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 6 Marzo 1991
  • Kaczmarek v. State, 91-03727
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 5 Enero 1994
    ...exception. On remand, the trial court shall strike the minimum mandatory requirement on the kidnapping conviction. See Cerrato v. State, 576 So.2d 351 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Peck v. State, 425 So.2d 664 (Fla. 2d DCA HALL, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur. ...
  • Spencer v. State, 90-2326
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 5 Noviembre 1991
    ...use of a firearm because the information did not allege, as to that particular count, that a firearm was used. Cerrato v. State, 576 So.2d 351 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). The cause is thus remanded for resentencing with directions that the attempted first degree murder conviction be reclassified fr......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT