Certified Question from U.S. Dist. Court, Dist. of Wyoming, Matter of, 4677

Decision Date26 May 1976
Docket NumberNo. 4677,4677
Citation549 P.2d 1310
Parties. James David HANCHEY v. Sue F. STEIGHNER et al. Supreme Court of Wyoming
CourtWyoming Supreme Court

GUTHRIE, Chief Justice.

The United States District Court for the District of Wyoming, having pursuant to §§ 1-193.3 through 1-193.4, W.S.1957, 1975 Cum.Supp., certified to this court a question as follows:

'Whether the Wyoming Guest Statute, Wyo.State. § 31-233, violates the equal protection guarantees and provisions of the Wyoming and United States Constitutions?

'This Court certifies that this question of law will be determinative of the captioned case presently pending in this Court, and that it appears to this Court that there is no controlling precedent on this precise issue in the existing decisions of the Wyoming Supreme Court.

'This litigation is grounded upon injuries sustained by the Plaintiff, James David Hanchey, when the vehicle he was occupying was involved in a single car accident in Natrona County, on August 9, 1974.

'At the time of the occurrence, the Plaintiff was occupying the right front seat of a Model 510, 1972 Datsun four-door sedan which was owned and being driven by the Defendant, Sue F. Steighner. As that vehicle, northbound on U.S. Highway 87, neared the Tea Pot Creek Bridge, the Defendant lost control of her vehicle, and it struck the bridge. In that impact, the Plaintiff sustained injury.'

and we find and conclude that:

1. The federal case is now merely in the pleading stage, there having been filed only a second amended complaint and an answer to second amended complaint.

2. The only facts certified are that the defendant, while driving her car, ran into a bridge, injuring plaintiff, a passenger.

3. Rule 52(c), W.R.C.P., provides as follows:

'(c) Reserved Questions. In all cases in which a district court reserves an important and difficult constitutional question arising in an action or proceeding pending before it, the district court, before sending the question to the supreme court for decision, shall (1) dispose of all necessary and controlling questions of fact and make special findings of fact thereon, and (2) state its conclusions of law on all points of common law and of construction, interpretation and meaning of statutes and of all instruments necessary for a complete decision of the case. No constitutional question shall be deemed to arise in an action unless, after all necessary special findings of fact and conclusions of law have been made by the district court, a decision on the constitutional question is necessary to the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Wyeth, Inc. v. Weeks, 1101397.
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • August 15, 2014
  • Wilschinsky v. Medina, 17658
    • United States
    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • June 29, 1989
    ... ... No. 17658 ... Supreme Court of New Mexico ... June 29, 1989 ... Page ...         This certification from the United States District Court raises a ntal question whether a third party, who is injured by a person ... The district court certified the following three questions to this court: ... In any case, we note the facts before us do not involve prescription and we specifically ... issues that preclude our finding as a matter of law the ... Page 718 ... [108 NM 516] ... Acton, 373 So.2d 952 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1979) (third-party complaint against ... in this regard as the Supreme Court of Wyoming which has said it will not answer a certified ... ...
  • Knudson v. Hilzer
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • June 29, 1976
    ... ... Supreme Court" of Wyoming ... June 29, 1976 ...        \xC2" ... part of my oats, which I had brought from Casper to be rolled at Lingle ... '5. That we ... answer will be that we do not reach this question and render no opinion in that regard ... If the parties want us to know what was argued and what was not, a ... party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.' Rule 56(c), W.R.C.P. These ... question as here presented, as certified by the United States District Court for the ... ...
  • Western Helicopter Services, Inc. v. Rogerson Aircraft Corp.
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • May 14, 1991
    ... ... Supreme Court of Oregon ... Submitted on the Record Jan. 9, ... Court may answer questions of law certified to it by the Supreme Court of the United States, ... 1 Our statute is taken from the Uniform Certified Questions of Law Act, which ... decline, for the first time, to accept a question certified to us under the Act. We shall explain, ... given to a similar statute by the Wyoming Supreme Court, which requires that its ... Matter of Certified Question From U.S. Dist. Ct., Etc., ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT