Cervera v. Bressler
| Decision Date | 11 September 2013 |
| Citation | 971 N.Y.S.2d 59,109 A.D.3d 780,2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 05790 |
| Parties | Frank CERVERA, appellant, v. Rossanna BRESSLER, respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Frank Cervera, Westtown, N.Y., appellant pro se.
Kathleen M. Hannon, Scarsdale, N.Y., attorney for the child.
In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated February 21, 2001, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colangelo, J.), dated July 30, 2012, which denied his motion, inter alia, to enforce certain visitation provisions of a prior order of the same court (DiBella, J.), dated July 29, 2010.
ORDERED that the order dated July 30, 2012, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
“The [Supreme] Court has broad discretion in fashioning a remedy in matters of custody and visitation, with the paramount concern being the best interests of the child” (Matter of Schick v. Schick, 72 A.D.3d 1100, 1101, 900 N.Y.S.2d 337 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Matter of Pignataro v. Davis, 8 A.D.3d 487, 488–489, 778 N.Y.S.2d 528;Matter of Plaza v. Plaza, 305 A.D.2d 607, 759 N.Y.S.2d 368). Here, giving due consideration to the wishes, age, and maturity of the child, it was a provident exercise of the court's discretion to decline to mandate visitation with the father where the child, who was 15 years old at the time of the Supreme Court's determination, had an extremely strained relationship with the father ( see Matter of Schick v. Schick, 72 A.D.3d at 1101, 900 N.Y.S.2d 337). Thus, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the father's motion which was to enforce certain visitation provisions of a prior order of the same court dated July 29, 2010.
The father's remaining contentions are without merit.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Sullivan v. Plotnick
...a strained relationship with the father and was vehemently opposed to any form of visitation with the father (see Cervera v. Bressler, 109 A.D.3d 780, 781, 971 N.Y.S.2d 59 ; Matter of Schick v. Schick, 72 A.D.3d 1100, 1101, 900 N.Y.S.2d 337 ). Thus, the court properly vacated all prior orde......
-
Lew v. Lew
...remedy in matters of custody and visitation, with the paramount concern being the best interests of the child’ " ( Cervera v. Bressler, 109 A.D.3d 780, 781, 971 N.Y.S.2d 59, quoting Matter of Schick v. Schick, 72 A.D.3d 1100, 1101, 900 N.Y.S.2d 337 ; see Matter of Pignataro v. Davis, 8 A.D.......
-
Hepheastou v. Spaliaras
...remedy in matters of custody and visitation, with the paramount concern being the best interests of the child’ " ( Cervera v. Bressler, 109 A.D.3d 780, 781, 971 N.Y.S.2d 59, quoting Matter of Schick v. Schick, 72 A.D.3d 1100, 1101, 900 N.Y.S.2d 337 ). "Absent extraordinary circumstances, wh......
- Klein v. GEICO Gen. Ins. Co.