Chaitman v. State
| Decision Date | 16 October 1986 |
| Docket Number | No. 86-480,86-480 |
| Citation | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2205,495 So.2d 1231 |
| Parties | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2205 Eric Allan CHAITMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, Brynn Newton, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Belle B. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
We affirm Chaitman's appeal from an order revoking probation and a judgment imposing concurrent sentences for four counts of burglary in all regards except the failure of the trial court to credit all four sentences with the full amount of the time appellant served in prison prior to sentencing. Appellant served 207 days before being placed on probation and 26 days following his arrest for violation of probation. He is therefore entitled to a total of 233 days credit; 1 and he is entitled to have such credit applied to each of his four concurrent sentences. 2 We agree with the state that Chaitman is not entitled to any credit for the 118 days he spent at the Probation and Restitution Center. 3
AFFIRMED IN PART; REMANDED TO CORRECT SENTENCES.
3 Sims v. State, 369 So.2d 431 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 383 So.2d 1202 (Fla.1980); State v. Jones, 327 So.2d 18 (Fla.1976), overruled in part on other grounds, State v. Holmes, 360 So.2d 380 (Fla.1978); § 948.06(2), Fla.Stat. (1985).
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Angell v. Allergan Sales, LLC
-
Phillips v. State, 94-837
...948.06(2) does not apply when defendant is placed on community control or probation in lieu of being sentenced); Chaitman v. State, 495 So.2d 1231 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986) (defendant served 207 days in prison before being placed on probation, which was revoked; upon resentencing defendant was en......
-
Cole v. State, 87-2387
...530 So.2d 324 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988), rev. denied, 539 So.2d 475 (Fla.1988); State v. Holmes, 360 So.2d 380 (Fla.1978); Chaitman v. State, 495 So.2d 1231 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); cf. Chapman v. State, 538 So.2d 965 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989) (court could only impose unserved portion of "true" split sente......
-
Butler v. State, 88-469
...He is entitled to credit only for the actual time spent in jail or prison. State v. Holmes, 360 So.2d 380 (Fla.1978); Chaitman v. State, 495 So.2d 1231 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). See also Walker v. State, 506 So.2d 78 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Hutchinson v. State, 467 So.2d 788 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). He ......