Chambers v. McDaniel
Decision Date | 31 December 1845 |
Parties | WILLIAM P. CHAMBERS et al. v. JOHN C. MCDANIEL et al. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
If a testator in his will refers expressly to another paper, and the will is duly executed and attested, that paper, whether attested or not, makes part of the will; but the instrument referred to must be so described, as to manifest distinctly what the paper is, that is meant to be incorporated; and the reference must be to a paper already written, and not to one to be written subsequently to the date of the will.
Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Caswell County, at the Fall Term, 1845, his Honor Judge DICK presiding.
In this case, a paper writing, purporting to be the last will and testament of William McDaniel, dec'd., was offered for probate, and being contested, an issue of devisavit vel non was made up. An appeal having been taken from the judgment below to the Superior Court, the following case agreed was then submitted to the Court:
At the Court of Pleas and Quarter Sessions of Caswell County, at January Term, 1832, the original paper, of which the following is a copy, was duly proved and recorded as the last will and testament of William McDaniel, dec'd. to-wit:
The will then appoints executors, &c. This paper, in the case agreed, is called A.
At October Term, 1845, a paper writing, marked B. in the case, was propounded for probate by the plaintiffs in this suit, as a part of the last will and testament of the said William McDaniel, dec'd. It is unnecessary to set forth this paper writing in detail. It purported to be a deed of conveyance, dated in 1823, from the said William McDaniel to William W. Price, for certain slaves and other personal property, for the sole and separate use of Sally Price, daughter of William McDaniel, for and during her natural life, and, after her death, the property to be conveyed to her children. This deed had subscribing witnesses, and was duly proved at July Term, 1823, and subsequently registered. The deed reserved to William McDaniel and his wife a life estate in the said property.
The defendants, by an order of the Court, were summoned to see proceedings and were regularly made parties thereto. Whereupon, an issue devisavit vel non, as to this paper, was submitted to a jury, who returned their verdict that the said paper writing was not the last will and testament of William McDaniel, dec'd., or any part thereof; the said Court pronounced judgment accordingly, and the plaintiffs appealed to the Superior Court. And now it is agreed by the parties, that the said paper writing, marked B., was executed by...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Tillman v. City of Carthage
... ... Shulsky, 157 P. 407; Jacobs v. Jacobs, 106 P ... 898; Whitney v. Harrington, 85 P. 84; Watson v ... Hinson, 73 S.E. 1089; Chambers v. Chambers, 28 ... N.C. 226; Cook v. Hensler, 107 P. 178; 40 Cyc. 1094; ... 68 L. R. A. 354, note; 8 R. C. L. 931. (2) When the will, the ... ...
-
White v. Reading
...instrument refers to another, the instrument or deed referred to becomes thereby part and parcel of the former instrument." In Chambers v. McDaniel, 28 N.C. 226, the headnote "If a testator in his will refers expressly to another paper, and the will is duly executed and attested, that paper......
-
White v. Reading
...instrument refers to another, the instrument or deed referred to becomes thereby part and parcel of the former instrument." In Chambers v. McDaniel, 28 N. C. 226, the headnote "If a testator in his will refers expressly to another paper, and the will is duly executed and attested, that pape......
-
Watson v. Hinson
... ... Siler v. Dorsett, 108 N.C. 300, 12 S.E. 986; ... Bailey v. Bailey, 52 N.C. 44; Chambers v ... McDaniel, 28 N.C. 226; Bullock v. Bullock, 17 ... N.C. 307; Thayer v. Wellington, 9 Allen (Mass.) 283, ... 85 Am. Dec. 761; Allen v ... ...