Chaplin v. Brown

Decision Date01 June 1891
Citation48 N.W. 1074,83 Iowa 156
PartiesCHAPLIN ET AL. v. BROWN ET AL.
CourtIowa Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from district court, Buena Vista county; LOT THOMAS, Judge.

Action at law to recover $150 damages, and for an injunction to restrain the defendants from pursuing the business of buying butter at Storm Lake, in Buena Vista county. Application for a temporary injunction was made to the judge in vacation. The defendants appeared and filed objections to the granting of the writ. The objections were sustained, and the plaintiffs appeal.T. H. Chapman and C. A. Irwin, for appellants.

T. D. Higgs, for appellees.

ROTHROCK, J.

It appears from the petition that in the month of March, 1890, the plaintiffs entered into a written agreement with the defendants and other parties. The following is a copy of said agreement:

We, the undersigned grocerymen of Storm Lake, finding the business of purchasing butter of farmers and handling the same very burdensome, and of material loss to us, and believing the same could be handled as advantageously by persons who would make butter buying and handling an exclusive business, and whereas, the firm of D. & E. Chaplin, though their agent, assure us of their ability to handle butter to the best advantage, and that they will engage in the business extensively in our town, we make a solemn engagement and pledge ourselves to each other and to the said firm of D. & E. Chaplin that we will buy no more butter or take no more in trade, except for our family use, and all butter so bought shall be delivered by the seller to the buyer's place of residence. This, however, shall not prevent any merchant from buying butter to retail from any regular butter buyer who buys all the butter he handles in this town for cash. It is further provided that the said firm of D. &. E. Chaplin, in whose favor we abandon the business, shall open rooms conveniently located for buying butter; that they shall keep a man in attendance during all business days and hours in the year from as early in the morning and until as late in the evening as the season of the year and state of the weather might seem to require. They shall accept all the butter offered, and shall pay for the same as high price in cash, or by giving check against a suitable deposit in some bank in this town, as merchants or butter buyers in the town of Newell, this county, are at the time paying in cash for a similar grade of butter, except in extreme cases, where they may be paying materially more than the markets will warrant. It is also provided that the said D. & E. Chaplin shall not direct their checks or persons taking the same to any particular store for payment. That they shall not buy in connection with any dry goods or grocery store. Whenever a majority of the merchants signing this article of agreement are convinced that the engagements herein entered into are not being complied with, or whenever they are dissatisfied with this arrangement or the manner in which it is being carried out, any merchant whose name is hereto appended may appoint a meeting by notifying each grocery firm in town of the time and place for the purpose of considering who may be guilty of a breach of faith in carrying out these engagements, or whether it is advisable to continue the same; and if, at such meeting, a majority of the subscribers hereto shall certify in writing that they think it advisable for the interest of the town to withdraw from this engagement, this contract shall become null and void. This engagement shall take effect and be in force from and after such time as when it shall have been subscribed to by each grocery house in this town, and when the firm of D. & E. Chaplin shall designate, provided they are then prepared to handle the butter, and shall continue two (2) years unless sooner dissolved, as herein provided. We also agree not to pay a higher price for eggs than shall be fixed by the said firm of D. & E. Chaplin, provided said firm shall fix as high...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • State v. Standard Oil Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 23, 1908
    ...Guthrie, 35 Ohio St. 666), Kentucky (Anderson v. Jett, 89 Ky. 375, 12 S. W. 670, 6 L. R. A. 390), Iowa (Chapin v. Brown, 83 Iowa, 156, 48 N. W. 1074, 12 L. R. A. 428, 32 Am. St. Rep. 297), Illinois (Craft v. McConoughy, 79 Ill. 346, 22 Am. Rep. 171, and More v. Bennett, 140 Ill. 69, 29 N. E......
  • The State ex inf. Hadley v. Standard Oil Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 9, 1909
    ... ... R ... 4 Ch. 654), or appoint one an exclusive agent for his ... commodity ( Newell v. Meyendorff, 9 Mont. 254; ... Trap Rock Co. v. Brown, 61 N. J. L. 536; Fuller ... v. Hope, 163 Pa. St. 62). So one can, to hold or obtain ... business, give secret rebates. In the consideration of ... ...
  • Ferd. Heim Brewing Co. v. Belinder
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • February 2, 1903
    ... ... 70] People v. Sheldon, 139 N.Y ... 251, 34 N.E. 785; Milwaukee Builders' v ... Niezerowski, 95 Wis. 129, 70 N.W. 166; Chapin v ... Brown, 83 Iowa 156, 48 N.W. 1074; India Bagging ... Assn. v. Kock, 14 La. Ann. 168; Vulcan Powder Co. v ... Powder Co., 96 Cal. 510, 31 P. 581; ... ...
  • Stewart v. W. T. Rawleigh Med. Co.
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • June 6, 1916
    ...20 S. Ct. 96, 44 L. Ed. 136; W. W. Montague & Co. v. Lowry, 193 U.S. 38, 24 S. Ct. 307, 48 L. Ed. 608; Chapin v. Brown Bros., 83 Iowa 156, 48 N.W. 1074, 12 L.R.A. 428, 32 Am. St. Rep. 297; Craft v. McConoughy, 79 Ill. 346, 22 Am. Rep. 171; W. H. Hill Co. v. Gray & Worcester, 163 Mich. 12, 1......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT