Chapman v. Alvis, 35965
Decision Date | 17 June 1959 |
Docket Number | No. 35965,35965 |
Citation | 169 Ohio St. 359,159 N.E.2d 453 |
Parties | , 8 O.O.2d 360 CHAPMAN v. ALVIS, Warden. |
Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
William H. Chapman, Cleveland, in pro. per.
Mark McElroy, Atty. Gen., and William M. Vance, Columbus, for respondent.
The trial court had jurisdiction of the person of the petitioner and of the offenses with which he was charged and to which he pleaded guilty. Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction to review the alleged errors of which he complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.
Petitioner remanded to custody.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Dye v. Sacks
...judgment of conviction to review alleged errors and cannot now have another review by a proceeding in habeas corpus. Chapman v. Alvis, 1959, 169 Ohio St. 359, 159 N.E.2d 453; 170 Ohio St. 97, 162 N.E.2d There being no substantial federal question in this case, the application for a certific......
-
Dye, In re, 36032
...judgment of conviction to review alleged errors and cannot now have another review by a proceeding in habeas corpus. Chapman v. Alvis, 169 Ohio St. 359, 159 N.E.2d 453. Petitioner remanded to WEYGANDT, C. J., and ZIMMERMAN, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL, HERBERT and PECK, JJ., concur. ...