Chapman v. Alvis, 35965

Decision Date17 June 1959
Docket NumberNo. 35965,35965
Citation169 Ohio St. 359,159 N.E.2d 453
Parties, 8 O.O.2d 360 CHAPMAN v. ALVIS, Warden.
CourtOhio Supreme Court

William H. Chapman, Cleveland, in pro. per.

Mark McElroy, Atty. Gen., and William M. Vance, Columbus, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court had jurisdiction of the person of the petitioner and of the offenses with which he was charged and to which he pleaded guilty. Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction to review the alleged errors of which he complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

WEYGANDT, C. J., and ZIMMERMAN, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL, HERBERT and PECK, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Dye v. Sacks
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • June 13, 1960
    ...judgment of conviction to review alleged errors and cannot now have another review by a proceeding in habeas corpus. Chapman v. Alvis, 1959, 169 Ohio St. 359, 159 N.E.2d 453; 170 Ohio St. 97, 162 N.E.2d There being no substantial federal question in this case, the application for a certific......
  • Dye, In re, 36032
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • November 25, 1959
    ...judgment of conviction to review alleged errors and cannot now have another review by a proceeding in habeas corpus. Chapman v. Alvis, 169 Ohio St. 359, 159 N.E.2d 453. Petitioner remanded to WEYGANDT, C. J., and ZIMMERMAN, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL, HERBERT and PECK, JJ., concur. ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT