Chapman v. McGrath

Decision Date21 May 1901
Citation163 Mo. 292,63 S.W. 832
CourtMissouri Supreme Court
PartiesCHAPMAN et al. v. McGRATH et al.

Appeal from St. Louis circuit court; L. B. Valliant, Judge.

Ejectment by George M. Chapman and others against P. McGrath and others. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendants appeal. Reversed.

This is an action of ejectment for the possession of a tract of land in the city of St. Louis, described as follows, to wit: Lot 6 of city block 1077, having a front of 25 feet on the south line of University street, and a depth southwardly of same width of 145 feet 4½ inches to a public alley, on which lot there is erected a two-story dwelling house, known as "No. 2536 University Street," all of the value of not exceeding $2,500. The plaintiffs are the minor children of Mary T. Chapman, deceased, and sue by their next friend, Thomas M. Quinn. Their mother purchased the property on the 14th day of September, 1896, and received a deed of that date therefor, which was recorded in the office of recorder of deeds in the city of St. Louis on September 17, 1896. At the time of the purchase of the property she, together with her minor children, the plaintiffs herein, took possession of it, and occupied it as their homestead until the 4th day of October, 1897. On the 14th day of September, 1896, Mrs. Chapman executed to Frederick A. Bacon, trustee, a deed of trust by which she conveyed to him the property in question, and delivered to him possession thereof, to secure to John T. Malter $600 and notes for the interest. Mary T. Chapman died November 10, 1896. Her estate was thereafter taken charge of by W. C. Richardson, public administrator of said city, who thereafter, in pursuance of an order of the probate court of said city, sold said property for the payment of debts allowed against the said estate, and, in accordance with said sale, executed to one F. A. Hinners a deed to said property, in which is recited the order of the probate court of the city of St. Louis made at its June term, 1897, directing said administrator to sell the land in question at private sale, and the steps taken by him in carrying out said order, the sale of the property to F. A. Hinners for the sum of $1,200, his report of sale at the next term of the probate court, and the approval thereof by the court. Hinners thereafter sold the property to the defendants McGrath for the sum of $2,100, and on the 4th day of October, 1897, his...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Collier v. Porter
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 29, 1929
    ...and minor children, there is no continuation of the homestead in the husband or children. Keyte v. Peery, 25 Mo.App. 400; Chapman v. McGrath, 163 Mo. 296; Richter Bohnsack, 144 Mo. 518. Seddon, C. Lindsay and Ellison, CC., concur. OPINION SEDDON Plaintiff, the widower of Emma Collier, decea......
  • Ragsdale v. Achuff
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • April 7, 1930
    ...homestead estate surviving, could render the entire property subject to plaintiff's contracts. Keyte v. Perry, 25 Mo. App. 394; Chapman v. McGrath, 163 Mo. 292; Collier v. Porter, 16 S.W. (2d) HENWOOD, C. By their petition in two counts, the plaintiffs seek, first, to recover the value of c......
  • Ragsdale v. Achuff
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • April 7, 1930
    ... ... 4; Gibbs v ... Haughowout, 207 Mo. 389; Smith v. Smith, 201 ... Mo. 533; Wood v. Matthews, 73 Mo. 477; sec. 5410, R ... S. 1919; Chapman v. Daugherty, 87 Mo. 617; ... Hughes v. Israel, 73 Mo. 538; Brown v ... Patterson, 224 Mo. 648. (5) The fact that the witness ... Eller was ... the entire property subject to plaintiff's contracts ... Keyte v. Perry, 25 Mo.App. 394; Chapman v ... McGrath, 163 Mo. 292; Collier v. Porter, 16 S.W.2d 49 ...          Henwood, ... C. Davis and Cooley, CC. , concur ...           ... ...
  • Collier v. Porter
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 29, 1929
    ...and minor children, there is no continuation of the homestead in the husband or children. Keyte v. Peery, 25 Mo. App. 400; Chapman v. McGrath, 163 Mo. 296; Richter v. Bohnsack, 144 Mo. SEDDON, C. Plaintiff, the widower of Emma Collier, deceased, brought this action, seeking a widower's shar......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT