Chapman v. White Sewing Machine Company

Decision Date21 May 1900
Citation28 So. 749,77 Miss. 890
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
PartiesWILLIAM C. CHAPMAN ET AL. v. WHITE SEWING MACHINE COMPANY

March, 1900

FROM the chancery court, second district, of Hinds county HON. HENRY C. CONN, Chancellor.

The Sewing Machine Co., appellee, was the complainant in the court below. The facts are stated in the previous report (76 Miss. 821), to which reference is made. The opinion now reported shows how the case came before the court a second time.

Decree affirmed, reversed and cause remanded.

W. C. Wells, for appellants.

A. H. Jayne and W. R. Harper, for appellee.

[A synopsis of the briefs of counsel on both sides is given in the former report of the case, 76 Miss. page 822.]

Argued orally by W. C. Wells, for appellants, and by W. R. Harper, for appellee.

OPINION

WHITFIELD, C. J.

After the delivery of the opinion in this case found in 76 Miss. 821, and after a suggestion of error therein had been overruled, it was ascertained tat at the time of the rendition of the judgment W. C. Chapman was dead. The judgment was therefore vacated as void, and this case, revivor having been had, has been again presented.

The opinion in 76 Miss. 821, supra, will be now re-entered as our opinion in this case, in all things except that the decree of the chancellor is affirmed as to the allotment of homestead.

The deed failing as to the one undivided half interest attempted to be conveyed to John D. Chapman, that half interest remained in the father, and if he chose to declare a homestead in 160 acres in which he only owned a one undivided half interest, he is bound by it. There might be a value attaching to that half interest making it specially desirable as a homestead, and of three thousand dollars value even, as to his undivided half therein. Appellee will pay all costs.

Decree affirmed in all things except as to the relief granted against Mrs. W. C. Chapman, and as to her the same is reversed and cause remanded for decree in accordance with this opinion.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Elmer v. Holmes
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • December 9, 1940
    ... ... Lewis ... v. White, 69 Miss. 352, 13 So. 349; Chapman v. White ... Sewing ... ...
  • State for Use of Russell v. Mcrae
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • February 26, 1934
    ... ... Pierce ... v. Chapman, 143 So. 845 ... The ... affirmative act by J ... Stamps, 4 S. & M. 352; Chapman v. White Sewing ... Machine Co., 77 Miss. 890, 28 So. 749; American ... Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, the surety on his bond ... as a member of such board. To ... ...
  • Holmes v. Elmer
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • May 23, 1938
    ... ... HON. W ... A. WHITE, Judge ... APPEAL ... from the circuit court ... v. White, 69 Miss. 352, 13 So. 349; Chapman v. White ... Sewing Machine Co., 77 Miss. 890, 28 So. 749; ... ...
  • Holmes v. Ferguson-McKinney Dry Goods Co.
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • July 24, 1905
    ... ... HOLMES ET AL. v. FERGUSON-MCKINNEY DRY GOODS COMPANY ET AL Supreme Court of MississippiJuly 24, 1905 ... 715; O'Conner v ... Ward, 60 Miss. 1025; Chapman v. White Sewing Machine ... Co., 77 Miss. 890 (15 Am. & ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT