Charlton v. State, 88-1162

Decision Date17 October 1989
Docket NumberNo. 88-1162,88-1162
Citation14 Fla. L. Weekly 2448,550 So.2d 150
Parties14 Fla. L. Weekly 2448 Larry CHARLTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Milton Hirsch, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Steven T. Scott, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

JORGENSON, Judge.

Larry Charlton appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence of life imprisonment for armed robbery. We affirm.

A few days after Rix Eden had been robbed of his wallet and other property at gunpoint in his South Dade body shop, police received a phone call from Charmaine Smith. Ms. Smith told police that her former boyfriend, Larry Charlton, was involved in a series of robberies. She described his car and the locations which he frequented. Ms. Smith did not implicate Charlton in the Eden robbery. Three weeks later, Eden's wallet was found and returned to him. Inside the wallet was a receipt from a local gas station made out to Larry Charlton. Detective Hernandez, the lead investigator on the Eden robbery, learned that Charlton's driver's license had been suspended. Hernandez and other officers staked out a bar which, according to Ms. Smith, Charlton frequented. The officers observed Charlton enter a car and drive away. After Charlton had driven for a short distance, he was stopped by uniformed officers on Hernandez' instructions. Hernandez noticed a bulge in Charlton's pants; a patdown revealed a gun. Charlton was arrested for driving while his license was suspended and for carrying a concealed firearm. At the police station, Charlton was photographed for a photo lineup. From that photo lineup, and from a later live lineup, Eden identified Charlton as the robber.

Charlton moved to suppress the two identifications as fruits of an illegal, pretextual search. At the suppression hearing, Hernandez testified as follows Q. On October 29th you were setting up your surveillance on the brown Cadillac because you anticipated Larry Charlton would be getting into it?

A. That's correct.

Q. You anticipated arresting Larry Charlton for Rix Eden's robbery.

A. I anticipated that, yes.

The trial court denied the motion to suppress. Following a jury trial, Charlton was found guilty of the Eden robbery. The trial court entered a judgment of conviction and sentenced Charlton to life imprisonment.

On appeal, Charlton contends that the identifications should have been suppressed as the fruits of a pretextual stop. We disagree.

Investigatory stops for noncriminal traffic infractions may raise the possibility that the stop was but a pretext for a search leading to an arrest on more serious charges. See, e.g., Arnold v. State, 544 So.2d 294 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989) (unlawful pretext stop for crossing center line); Monroe v. State, 543 So.2d 298 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) (unlawful pretext stop for bald tire); Porcher v. State, 538 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) (unlawful pretext stop for following other traffic too closely); Brooks v. State, 524 So.2d 1102 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (unlawful pretext stop for improper start of motor vehicle).

There is a vast difference, however, between a noncriminal traffic infraction and the offense for which Charlton was arrested. Driving with a suspended driver's license is a second degree misdemeanor, punishable by a term of imprisonment not exceeding sixty days. §§ 322.34(1) and 775.082(3)(b), Fla.Stat. (1985). When Charlton drove away from the bar, he committed a misdemeanor in the officer's...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • State v. Orozco
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • October 6, 1992
    ...So.2d 97 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 500 So.2d 544 (Fla.1986), State v. Taswell, 560 So.2d 257 (Fla. 3d DCA1990), and Charlton v. State, 550 So.2d 150 (Fla. 3d DCA1989), cited by the majority in support of reversal, provide no support. Those cases are factually distinguishable from the ca......
  • State v. Pugh
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • April 20, 1994
    ...this arrest for a misdemeanor occurring in the presence of the officer is not a pretextual stop. See, e.g., Charlton v. State, 550 So.2d 150 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (stop for driving with suspended license is not pretextual); State v. Leyva, 599 So.2d 691 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (officer's knowledge ......
  • Bradley v. State, 89-494
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • March 7, 1990
    ...A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Bradley R. Bischoff, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Charlton v. State, 550 So.2d 150 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). SHIVERS, C.J., and JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., ...
  • Charlton v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • June 20, 2007
    ...Larry Charlton, in proper person. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, for appellee. Before GERSTEN, FLETCHER, and SUAREZ, JJ. Prior report: 550 So.2d 150. PER This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). On appeal from a summary de......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT