Charter Oak Council, Inc. v. Town of New Hartford
Decision Date | 10 June 1936 |
Citation | 121 Conn. 466,185 A. 575 |
Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
Parties | CHARTER OAK COUNCIL, Inc., BOY Scouts of America. v. TOWN OF NEW HARTFORD et al. |
Appeal from Superior Court, Litchfield County; Newell Jennings Judge.
Action by the Charter Oak Council, Incorporated, Boy Scouts of America, against the Town of New Hartford and others for a judgment declaring property of the plaintiff in defendant town to be exempt from taxation, brought to the superior court and tried to the court. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.
Error and a new trial ordered.
Conclusion that Charter Oak Council, Inc., Boy Scouts of America, was organized and that its camp was used exclusively for " educational" and " charitable purposes," within tax exemption statute, held supported by finding although it was found that each boy scout attending camp paid regular charge toward expenses, that camp store was operated for 20 minutes a day, small profits from which were devoted to camp fund, and that, when income permitted, certain officials and employees were paid bonuses in addition to salaries. Gen.St.1930, § 1163(7) (Rev.1949, § 1761); 36 U.S.C.A. § 21 et seq.
H. Roger Jones, of Hartford, for appellants.
W. Arthur Countryman, Jr., of Hartford, for appellee.
Argued before MALTBIE, C.J., and HINMAN, BANKS, AVERY, and BROWN, JJ.
The complaint alleged that the plaintiff, a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Connecticut, " is engaged in the mental, moral and physical education, including training in patriotism, courage, self-reliance and kindred virtues of young boys in the County of Hartford," and owns certain land with buildings thereon in the town of New Hartford, which are used during the summer months each year for the purpose of a camping ground; that this property is exempt from taxation, under section 1163 of the General Statutes, subdivision (7), as " the real property of *** a Connecticut corporation organized exclusively for scientific, educational, literary, historical or charitable purposes or for two or more such purposes and used exclusively for carrying out one or more of such purposes and the personal property of, or held in trust for, any such corporation, provided (a) any officer, member or employee thereof does not receive or at any future time shall not receive any pecuniary profit from the operations thereof, except reasonable compensation for services in effecting one or more of such purposes or as proper beneficiary of its strictly charitable purposes" ; and prayed for a judgment so declaring. Allegations pertaining, to the assessment of a tax on the property in the list of 1933 and a claim that the assessment be declared illegal and void were not pursued or relied upon on the trial except as affecting the general claim to exemption.
On the trial the court found that the plaintiff is a corporation without capital stock, organized under the general law (General Statutes, chap. 192 [section 3497 et seq.]), but also operates under a charter granted to it by the Boy Scouts of America, the national organization, a corporation chartered by the Congress of the United States (U.S.C.A. title 36, chap. 2 [section 21 et seq.]). The articles of association of the Connecticut corporation dated December 9, 1919, set forth the purposes as being: The certificate of incorporation was signed by nine persons, and was approved by the Secretary of the State and recorded as prescribed by the statute (section 3498). This provides that and by causing a certificate to be filed, recorded, and approved in the same manner as the original certificate of incorporation.
On September 27, 1933, with the obvious purpose of bringing the corporation expressly within proviso (a) of section 1163 (7) of the General Statutes, above quoted, and of accomplishing the segregation of the corporation's property from private, and dedication of it to public, uses essential to exemption from taxation, the executive board of the plaintiff corporation adopted the following resolution: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Romero v. Weakley
...action for declaratory judgment for the determination of those issues of Connecticut law involved here. Charter Oak Council, Inc., v. Town of New Hartford, 121 Conn. 466, 185 A. 575; Conzelman v. City of Bristol, 122 Conn. 218, 188 A. 659; Walsh v. City of Bridgeport, 2 Conn.Supp. "We there......
-
HORSE OF CONNECTICUT, INC. v. Washington
...services. See Camp Isabella Freedman of Connecticut, Inc. v. Canaan, supra, 147 Conn. 512; Charter Oak Council, Boy Scouts of America v. New Hartford, 121 Conn. 466, 473, 185 A. 575 (1936). There are no facts alleged that Wahlers makes any profit from the operation of the plaintiff corporat......
-
McGee v. Dunnigan
...seek to have a statute construed where the effect of that construction does not affect his personal rights. Charter Oak Council, Inc. v. New Hartford, 121 Conn. 466, 475, 185 A. 575, is a good illustration of a situation which entitles a taxpayer to such a In Board of Education of Stamford ......
-
Spector Motor Service v. Laughlin, 62
...an action for declaratory judgment for the determination of those issues of Connecticut law involved here. Charter Oak Council, Inc., v. Town of New Bedford, 121 Conn. 466, 185 A. 575; Conzelman v. City of Bristol, 122 Conn. 218, 188 A. 659; Walsh v. City of Bridgeport, 2 Conn.Supp. We ther......