Chase v. State
| Decision Date | 09 May 1927 |
| Docket Number | 25989 |
| Citation | Chase v. State, 147 Miss. 694, 112 So. 785 (Miss. 1927) |
| Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
| Parties | CHASE v. STATE. [*] |
Suggestion of Error Overruled June 6, 1927.
APPEAL from circuit court of Prentiss county HON. C. P. LONG, Judge.
Charlie Chase appeals. Affirmed.
Affirmed.
E. C. Sharp, for appellant.
J. A. Lauderdale, Assistant Attorney-General, for the state.
The credibility of, and the weight to be given to, the dying declaration were for the jury, and the evidence warrants the verdict.
The other assignments of error, not being argued, are waived.
Affirmed.
---------
Notes:
[*]Corpus Juris-Cyc. References: Criminal Law, 17CJ, p. 212, n. 18; Homicide, 30CJ, p. 270, n. 84; p. 310, n. 25; As to right of jury to determine existence of facts essential to the admissibility of dying declarations, see Annotation in 56 L. R. A. 445; 16 L. R. A. (N. S.) 660; 52 L. R. A. (N. S.) 152; 1 R. C. L. 547; 1 R. C. L. Supp. 194.
---------
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Conway v. State
...v. State, 94 Miss. 83, 47 So. 502; Nelms v. State, 13 S. & M. 500, 53 Am. Dec. 94; Brown v. State, 32 Miss. 433, and Chase v. State, 147 Miss. 694, 112 So. 785. are of the opinion, however, that under the particular facts of this case that error was harmless. Other witnesses whose evidence ......
-
Calloway v. State
... ... 206 ... Forrest ... B. Jackson, Assistant Attorney-General, for the state ... An ... assignment not having been argued is waived by the appellant ... Pope v ... State, 67 So. 177, 108 Miss. 706; Davis v. State, 67 ... So. 662, 67 So. 178, 108 Miss. 710; Chase v. State, 112 So ... 785, 147 Miss. 694 ... Evidence ... of the good character of the accused should go to the jury as ... any other fact, and its influence in the determination of the ... case should be left to the jury without any intimation from ... the court of its influence ... ...
-
Harris v. State
... ... State, 156 Miss. 612, 126 So. 390; Dewberry v ... State, 168 Miss. 366, 151 So. 479 ... Assignment ... not argued should be considered as waived ... Johnson ... v. State, 154 Miss. 512, 122 So. 529; Bridges v ... State, 154 Miss. 489, 122 So. 533; Chase v. State, 147 ... Miss. 694, 112 So. 785 ... [166 So. 393] ... [175 ... Miss. 3] Smith, C. J ... This is ... an appeal from a conviction of murder followed by a life ... sentence in the penitentiary. The appellant's complaints ... are (1) that the ... ...
-
Bridges v. State
... ... v. State, 109 So. 29; Penn v. State, 62 Miss. 450; ... State v. Harris, 10 So. 478 ... Errors ... not assigned and assignments of error not argued are waived ... Pope v ... State, 108 Miss. 706; Davis v. State, 67 So. 662; ... Harris v. State, 142 Miss. 342; Chase v. State, 147 ... Miss. 694 ... [154 ... Miss. 491] GRIFFITH, J ... The ... appellant contends that it was error in the trial court to ... refuse the following instruction requested by appellant: ... "The court instructs the jury for the defendant that ... ...