Chastain v. Federal Ins. Co., s. 75--1039
| Decision Date | 02 June 1976 |
| Docket Number | Nos. 75--1039,75--1129,s. 75--1039 |
| Citation | 338 So.2d 214 |
| Parties | Josephine CHASTAIN, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of William Wilbur Chastain, Deceased, Appellant, v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
George Schwartz, Miami Beach, for Chastain.
Weissenborn, Burr & Hyman, Miami, for Allstate.
Carey, Dwyer, Austin, Cole & Selwood and Steven Berger, Miami, for Federal.
Before HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal a final judgment in favor of defendant Federal Insurance Company in an action to recover the excess over the policy limits of the judgment on the alleged ground that Federal exercised bad faith in refusing to settle the claim for the policy limits.
On December 1, 1967 William Wilbur Chastain was driving an automobile owned by Jack Rhodabarger and insured by Allstate Insurance Company, one of the appellants, when it was struck by an automobile driven by Julio Sanchez and owned by Maximino Jorge who was uninsured. Sanchez, however, had an automobile liability insurance policy with $10,000/20,000 limits issued by Federal. As a result of the collision, William Chastin was fatally injured and his wife Josephine, a passenger in the car and the other appellant, sustained serious bodily injury. On behalf of herself and as administratrix of her husband's estate, she filed suit against Sanchez and Jorge. Federal undertook to defend Sanchez, but concluded it afforded no coverage to Jorge. Subsequently, Mrs. Chastain settled with Federal as to Sanchez for $19,500. She also obtained a $70,000 default judgment against Jorge and then successfully pursued a $20,000 uninsured motorist claim against Allstate (because Jorge had no liability coverage). Thereafter Mrs. Chastain and Allstate, as subrogee, filed the instant bad faith action for Federal's alleged failure to settle on behalf of Jorge. The cause came on for final hearing and the trial judge entered judgment in favor of Federal. Allstate and Josephine Chastain appeal. We affirm.
The established law in Florida is that in cases where recovery of the excess over policy limits of a judgment against the insured is sought from his insurer upon the ground that the insurer's conduct in failing to effect a settlement within the policy limits amounts to...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
General Acc. Fire & Life Assur. Corp., Ltd. v. American Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa.
...of an offer by the claimant was not germane to the resolution of the case. The Beck rule was followed in Chastain v. Federal Insurance Co., 338 So.2d 214 (Fla.3d DCA 1976). Other courts, however, have held different views. In Thomas v. Western World Insurance Co., 343 So.2d 1298 (Fla.2d DCA......
-
Markel Am. Ins. Co. v. Flugga
...an insurance company could not be held liable for alleged bad faith in delaying its offer of settlement. See Chastain v. Federal Ins. Co., 338 So. 2d 214 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976) and Beck v. Kelly, 323 So.2d 667 (Fla. App. 3d Dist. 1975), both receded from in General Acc. Fire & Life Assu......
-
Davis v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., KK-207
...368 (S.D.Fla.1969), Aff'd, 425 F.2d 393 (5th Cir.), Cert. den. 400 U.S. 833, 91 S.Ct. 64, 27 L.Ed.2d 64; Chastain v. Federal Insurance Co., 338 So.2d 214 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), Cert. den., 352 So.2d 169; Beck v. Kelly, 323 So.2d 667 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); American Fidelity Fire Insurance Co. v. J......
-
Snowden ex rel. Snowden v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas.
...limits was never communicated to the insurer, and Defendant cites two of these early cases in its motion: Chastain v. Federal Insurance Co., 338 So.2d 214 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976) and Beck v. Kelly, 323 So.2d 667 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). However, although Florida courts once adhered to this rule, more......