Chasteen v. State, CR-93-171
Decision Date | 17 June 1994 |
Docket Number | CR-93-171 |
Parties | Jerry Anthony CHASTEEN v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
The appellant, Jerry Anthony Chasteen, appealed from the revocation of his probation. We remanded this cause so that the circuit court could furnish the appellant with written findings as to the reasons it relied on in revoking his probation. Chasteen v. State, 652 So.2d 318 (Ala.Cr.App.1994). The court filed the following findings on return to remand:
The appellant argues that there was not sufficient reliable evidence for the court to revoke his probation. The appellant has preserved this issue by raising this issue in his motion for reconsideration. Hollis v. State, 598 So.2d 38 (Ala.Cr.App.1992).
The appellant's probation was revoked solely on the hearsay testimony of Officer Mike Cowart of the Decatur Police Department, who testified that he spoke with K.A. and her daughter and that they told him that a man matching the appellant's description had exposed himself to them at a shopping center in Decatur.
This court has many times in the past held that hearsay testimony may not form the sole basis for revoking an individual's probation. Williams v. State, 557 So.2d 857 (Ala.Cr.App.1990); Patton v. State, 551 So.2d 1179 (Ala.Cr.App.1989); Weaver v. State, 515 So.2d 79 (Ala.Cr.App.1987); Mitchell v. State, 462 So.2d 740 (Ala.Cr.App.1984); Watkins v. State, 455 So.2d 160 (Ala.Cr.App.1984); Moore v. State, 432 So.2d 552 (Ala.Cr.App.1983); Hill v. State, 350 So.2d 716 (Ala.Cr.App.1977).
As Judge Patterson stated in Mitchell v. State, 462 So.2d 740, 742 (Ala.Cr.App.1984):
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Graham v. Jones
...be 'reasonably satisfied from the evidence that the probationer has violated the conditions of his probation.'" Chasteen v. State, 652 So.2d 319, 320 (Ala.Cr.App., 1994), quoting Armstrong v. State, 294 Ala. 100, 312 So. 2d 620 (1975). In Ringstaff v. State, 480 So.2d 50, 51 (Ala. Crim. App......
-
Walker v. State
...basis for revoking an individual's probation. See Clayton v. State, 669 So. 2d 220, 222 (Ala. Cr. App. 1995) ; Chasteen v. State, 652 So. 2d 319, 320 (Ala. Cr. App. 1994) ; and Mallette v. State, 572 So. 2d 1316, 1317 (Ala. Cr. App. 1990). "The use of hearsay as the sole means of proving a ......
-
Knight v. State
...basis for revoking an individual's probation. See Clayton v. State, 669 So. 2d 220, 222 (Ala. Cr. App. 1995) ; Chasteen v. State, 652 So. 2d 319, 320 (Ala. Cr. App. 1994) ; and Mallette v. State, 572 So. 2d 1316, 1317 (Ala. Cr. App. 1990). ‘The use of hearsay as the sole means of proving a ......
-
Johnson v. State
...the sole basis for revoking an individual's probation. See Clayton v. State, 669 So.2d 220, 222 (Ala.Cr.App.1995); Chasteen v. State, 652 So.2d 319, 320 (Ala.Cr.App.1994); and Mallette v. State, 572 So.2d 1316, 1317 (Ala.Cr.App.1990).’ ” Hall v. State, 964 So.2d 91, 93 (Ala.Crim.App.2007), ......