Chemical Cleaning, Inc. v. Chemical Cleaning & Equipment Service, Inc., No. B--2338

CourtSupreme Court of Texas
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM
Citation462 S.W.2d 276
Decision Date21 October 1970
Docket NumberNo. B--2338
PartiesCHEMICAL CLEANING, INC., Petitioner, v. CHEMICAL CLEANING & EQUIPMENT SERVICE, INC. et al., Respondents.

Page 276

462 S.W.2d 276
CHEMICAL CLEANING, INC., Petitioner,
v.
CHEMICAL CLEANING & EQUIPMENT SERVICE, INC. et al.,
Respondents.
No. B--2338.
Supreme Court of Texas.
Oct. 21, 1970.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 9, 1970.

Gordon R. Pate, Beaumont, for petitioner.

Page 277

William E. Townsley, Beaumont, Donald B. Moye, Nederland, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The opinion of the court of civil appeals is reported in 456 S.W.2d 724. We refuse writ of error, no reversible error. In so doing, we are not to be understood as approving the form of the point of error suggested by the court of civil appeals for presenting a contention that a jury's answer to a special issue is so against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence as to be manifestly unjust. A trial court may commit error in overruling a motion for new trial because vital jury findings are contrary to the great weight and preponderance of the evidence, but it does not for that reason commit error in rendering judgment on the verdict. Hence, a point of error which states that the trial court erred in rendering judgment on a verdict because of the state of the evidence--if it is adequate for any purpose--is only a 'no evidence' point. Cf. Travelers Insurance Company v. Williams, 378 S.W.2d 110 (Tex.Civ.App.--Amarillo 1964, writ ref'd, n.r.e.).

To continue reading

Request your trial
49 practice notes
  • Cohen v. Rains, No. 2-87-115-CV
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas
    • April 27, 1989
    ...861 (Tex.Civ.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1981, no writ); see also Chemical Cleaning, Inc. v. Chemical Cleaning & Equipment Service, Inc., 462 S.W.2d 276, 277 (Tex.1970) (per Page 389 curiam). This point should be sustained when the evidence establishes conclusively the opposite of a vital fac......
  • Northwest Mall, Inc. v. Lubri-lon Intern., Inc., LUBRI-LON
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas
    • October 18, 1984
    ...in such a manner are adequate only as "no evidence" points. Chemical Cleaning, Inc. v. Chemical Cleaning & Equipment Service, Inc., 462 S.W.2d 276 (Tex.1970). See also Chrysler Corporation v. Schuenemann, 618 S.W.2d 799, 806 (Tex.Civ.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1981, writ ref'd n.r.e.). But s......
  • Bluebonnet Exp., Inc. v. Employers Ins. of Wausau, No. B14-82-128CV
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas
    • April 28, 1983
    ...caused trouble in the past. The origin of all the mischief is Chemical Cleaning, Inc. v. Chemical Cleaning and Equipment Service, Inc., 462 S.W.2d 276 (Tex.1970) (per curiam), in which the Supreme Court made the statement that "a point of error which states that the trial court erred in ren......
  • Herbert v. Herbert, No. 2-84-197-CV
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas
    • November 27, 1985
    ...Appellee's contention is based upon the language contained in Chemical Cleaning, Inc., v. Chemical Cleaning & Equipment Service, Inc., 462 S.W.2d 276 (Tex.1970) (per curiam) wherein the Court A trial court may commit error in overruling a motion for new trial because vital jury findings are......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
49 cases
  • Cohen v. Rains, No. 2-87-115-CV
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas
    • April 27, 1989
    ...861 (Tex.Civ.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1981, no writ); see also Chemical Cleaning, Inc. v. Chemical Cleaning & Equipment Service, Inc., 462 S.W.2d 276, 277 (Tex.1970) (per Page 389 curiam). This point should be sustained when the evidence establishes conclusively the opposite of a vital fac......
  • Northwest Mall, Inc. v. Lubri-lon Intern., Inc., LUBRI-LON
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas
    • October 18, 1984
    ...in such a manner are adequate only as "no evidence" points. Chemical Cleaning, Inc. v. Chemical Cleaning & Equipment Service, Inc., 462 S.W.2d 276 (Tex.1970). See also Chrysler Corporation v. Schuenemann, 618 S.W.2d 799, 806 (Tex.Civ.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1981, writ ref'd n.r.e.). But s......
  • Bluebonnet Exp., Inc. v. Employers Ins. of Wausau, No. B14-82-128CV
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas
    • April 28, 1983
    ...caused trouble in the past. The origin of all the mischief is Chemical Cleaning, Inc. v. Chemical Cleaning and Equipment Service, Inc., 462 S.W.2d 276 (Tex.1970) (per curiam), in which the Supreme Court made the statement that "a point of error which states that the trial court erred in ren......
  • Herbert v. Herbert, No. 2-84-197-CV
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas
    • November 27, 1985
    ...Appellee's contention is based upon the language contained in Chemical Cleaning, Inc., v. Chemical Cleaning & Equipment Service, Inc., 462 S.W.2d 276 (Tex.1970) (per curiam) wherein the Court A trial court may commit error in overruling a motion for new trial because vital jury findings are......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT