Chemical Residential Mortgage v. Rector

Decision Date07 October 1998
Docket Number No. 97-4380, No. 98-432.
Citation742 So.2d 300
PartiesCHEMICAL RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE, formerly known as Margaretten & Company, Inc., now known as Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation, Appellant, v. Terry RECTOR and Patricia Rector, et al., Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Roger D. Bear of Roger D. Bear, P.A, Orlando, and Shawn G. Rader of Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

Fred Tromberg and Deborah L. Greene of Tromberg & Safer, Jacksonville, for Appellees Terry Rector and Patricia Rector.

BARFIELD, Chief Judge.

In this appeal from several orders entered in a mortgage foreclosure action, we find that the trial court erred as a matter of law in its order of June 30, 1997, in which it denied the appellant/mortgagor's April 23, 1997, motion to amend the final judgment of foreclosure and reset the sale date, vacated the April 7, 1995, final judgment of foreclosure, and vacated the August 5, 1996, order amending the final judgment. We find that the complaint properly stated a cause of action for foreclosure by the holder of the note and mortgage. When they did not timely respond to the complaint, the appellees/mortgagees waived any denial of its allegations that the appellant was the owner and holder of the note and mortgage and that the appellees had defaulted on the note and mortgage. Because the lien follows the debt,1 there was no requirement of attachment of a written and recorded assignment of the mortgage in order for the appellant to maintain the foreclosure action.

The June 30, 1997, order is REVERSED. The appellees' motion for appellate attorney fees is DENIED. The appellant is entitled to appellate attorney fees. This case is REMANDED to the trial court, which shall reinstate the April 7, 1995, final judgment of foreclosure, vacate its order of June 30, 1997, and all subsequent orders, reconsider the appellant's motion to amend the final judgment of foreclosure and set a new sale date, and determine a reasonable appellate attorney fee.

DAVIS, J. and SHIVERS, DOUGLASS B., Senior Judge, concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • Law Office of Stern v. Security Nat. Corp.
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • July 5, 2007
    ...and holder of the note and mortgage and that the mortgagee has defaulted on that note and mortgage. See Chemical Residential Mortgage v. Rector, 742 So.2d 300, 300 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). In such actions, an attorney's duty is to the client only to the extent that the client is the owner and h......
  • Jaffer v. Chase Home Fin., LLC
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 7, 2015
    ...cited State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Horkheimer, 814 So.2d 1069, 1072 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) and Chemical Residential Mortgage v. Rector, 742 So.2d 300 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), for the contentions that a default admits all well-pled facts and waives any denial of the allegations that the......
  • US Bank, NA v. Glicken
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 27, 2017
    ...follows the note. See Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. v. Lippi, 78 So.3d 81, 85 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (citing Chem. Residential Mortg. v. Rector, 742 So.2d 300, 300–01 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) ). As such, standing to foreclose is focused on the promissory note. When the note with an undated blank indo......
  • Taylor v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 9, 2011
    ...and recorded assignment of the mortgage in order for the appellant to maintain the foreclosure action.” Chem. Residential Mortg. v. Rector, 742 So.2d 300, 300–01 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (footnote omitted). Because ownership of the mortgage followed the note in the absence of a contrary intentio......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Business & commercial cases
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Florida Causes of Action
    • April 1, 2022
    ...the complaint should allege that the plaintiff is the holder of the note and mortgage. Source Chemical Residential Mortgage v. Rector , 742 So. 2d 300 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); but see Fla. Stat. §702.015 (2013). See Also 1. Clay County Land Trust #08–04–25–0078–014–27, Orange Park Trust Service......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT