Cheng v. Modansky Leasing Co., Inc.

Decision Date29 February 1988
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
PartiesLAI LING CHENG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MODANSKY LEASING CO., INC. et al., third-party Plaintiffs; Town of La Grange, et al., third-party Defendants. Edward J. Murtaugh, nonparty Respondent-Appellant; Lipsig, Sullivan & Liapakis, P.C., nonparty Appellant-Respondent.

Lipsig, Sullivan & Liapakis, P.C., New York City (Harry H. Lipsig, Cyrus M. Diamond and Cheryl Eisberg Moin, of counsel), nonparty appellant-respondent pro se.

Corbally, Gartland & Rappleyea, Poughkeepsie (Daniel F. Leary, of counsel), for nonparty respondent-appellant.

Before KUNZEMAN, J.P., and RUBIN, HARWOOD and BALLETTA, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs' firm of successor attorneys, Lipsig, Sullivan and Liapakis, P.C. (hereinafter the Lipsig firm) appeals, and the plaintiffs' prior attorney Edward Murtaugh cross-appeals on the ground of inadequacy, from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Rosenblatt, J.), dated July 15, 1986, which after a hearing, awarded Murtaugh, the attorney who represented the plaintiffs in this matter prior to the commencement of the lawsuit, the principal sum of $108,000, representing 20% of the total attorney's fee in the underlying lawsuit and the balance to the Lipsig firm.

ORDERED that the order and judgment is modified, by reducing the award to Murtaugh to the principal sum of $35,000; as so modified, the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs to the Lipsig firm, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, for entry of an appropriate amended judgment, which shall be paid in full within 30 days after service upon the Lipsig firm of a copy of the amended judgment, with notice of entry.

On September 27, 1982, the plaintiffs' conservatee, Teresa Wong, sustained massive injuries when her vehicle collided with a tractor-trailer that had jack-knifed and crossed over into the opposite lane of traffic in which Wong was proceeding. The accident resulted in Ms. Wong's permanent mental and physical incapacitation.

That same evening, Ms. Wong's mother and uncle retained a local Dutchess County lawyer, Edward Murtaugh, to prosecute their claim for damages for Ms. Wong's injuries against the driver and corporate lessor and lessee of the tractor-trailer on a one-third contingency basis. Murtaugh performed numerous preliminary services for the plaintiffs but did not commence a lawsuit. On April 21, 1983, the plaintiffs discharged Murtaugh, without cause, and retained the Lipsig firm, again on a one-third contingency basis, to pursue their lawsuit. In a letter to Murtaugh dated May 2, 1983, the Lipsig firm acknowledged Murtaugh's lien for prior legal services, which it was agreed would be determined by the court at the conclusion of the litigation. The Lipsig firm thereafter performed all the legal work on the case. Some months before the case was scheduled to come to trial, the Lipsig firm settled it for $1,800,000 out of the defendant's $2,000,000 policy. The attorneys' fee was set by the court at $540,000. No agreement having been reached as to the amount due to Murtaugh, various motions were brought and a hearing was held, resulting in a ruling that 20% of this fee, or $108,000, plus interest, should be paid to Murtaugh. On appeal, both attorneys contest this figure, the Lipsig firm arguing that it is excessive, and Murtaugh alleging that it is inadequate.

On appeal, the Lipsig firm argues that because Murtaugh never instituted a lawsuit before he was discharged, he never became their attorney of record, so that he is entitled only...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • 3 d5 Abril d5 1998
    ...affixed to the pleadings, motions, records, briefs, or other papers submitted in the matter."); Lai Ling Cheng v. Modansky Leasing Co., 137 A.D.2d 781, 783, 525 N.Y.S.2d 328 (2d Dept.1988) ("an attorney whose name nowhere appears in the pleadings, motion papers, affidavits, briefs or record......
  • Lai Ling Cheng v. Modansky Leasing Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 4 d4 Maio d4 1989
    ...of record, was not entitled to a charging lien under Judiciary Law § 475, and therefore could not claim a contingent fee (137 A.D.2d 781, 783, 525 N.Y.S.2d 328). Accordingly, it limited him to the reasonable value of his services measured by time and expenses. It deemed a fee of $35,000 rea......
  • Lai Ling Cheng v. Modansky Leasing Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 11 d1 Setembro d1 1989
    ...the award to Murtaugh to the principal sum of $35,000, calculated on a strict quantum meruit basis (see, Lai Ling Cheng v. Modansky Leasing Co., 137 A.D.2d 781, 525 N.Y.S.2d 328). By order dated May 4, 1989, the Court of Appeals reversed the decision and order of this court and remitted the......
  • Lai Ling Cheng v. Modansky Leasing Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 13 d2 Setembro d2 1988
    ...72 N.Y.2d 806, 529 N.E.2d 177 Cheng (Lai Ling) v. Modansky Leasing Co., Inc. NO. 767 COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK SEP 13, 1988 137 A.D.2d 781, 525 N.Y.S.2d 328 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO Granted. ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT