Chesson v. State, 98-2062.

Decision Date17 March 1999
Docket NumberNo. 98-2062.,98-2062.
Citation729 So.2d 974
PartiesChristopher CHESSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Christopher Chesson, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Simone P. Firley, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, GODERICH, and GREEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant appeals the denial of his motion made pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.800 to vacate his twenty year sentence entered pursuant to a plea agreement on the grounds that it is illegal. For purposes of rule 3.800, an illegal sentence is one that exceeds the maximum period set forth by law for a particular offense without regard to the guidelines. See Davis v. State, 661 So.2d 1193, 1196 (Fla.1995)

; Wright v. State, 711 So.2d 66, 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Hinson v. State, 709 So.2d 629, 630 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); State v. Moten, 698 So.2d 1345, 1346 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Skidmore v. State, 688 So.2d 1014, 1015 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). The sentence imposed upon the appellant is less than the statutory maximum sentence for the crimes that he committed1 and is therefore not an illegal sentence as prescribed under rule 3.800. Therefore, finding no merit to the appellant's argument, we affirm the order under review.

Affirmed.

1. Based upon the kidnapping charge alone, the appellant was eligible for a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Thacker v. Singletary
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Florida
    • 19 Septiembre 2000
    ...(1995). An illegal sentence is one which exceeds the statutory maximum without regard for the sentencing guidelines. Chesson v. State, 729 So.2d 974, 975 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). However, it is recognized that a sentence within the statutory maximum may be an illegal one where the sentence was m......
  • Guerra-Villafane v. Singletary, 98-1547.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 17 Marzo 1999
    ... ... State, 629 So.2d 90 (Fla.1993). We therefore grant the petition and remand for a new trial ... ...
  • Watkins v. State, 3D19-1729
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 20 Noviembre 2019
    ...Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.Before SALTER, LINDSEY, and HENDON, JJ.PER CURIAM. Page 2 Affirmed. See Chesson v. State, 729 So. 2d 974, 975 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) ("For purposes of rule 3.800, an illegal sentence is one that exceeds the maximum period set forth by law for a particular o......
  • Hill v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 21 Julio 2021
    ...affirmative allegations "that the court records demonstrate on their face an entitlement to ... relief"); see also Chesson v. State, 729 So. 2d 974, 975 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) ("[A]n illegal sentence is one that exceeds the maximum period set forth by law for a particular offense without regard......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT