Cheswick v. Freeman

Decision Date22 September 1955
Docket NumberNo. 3296,3296
Citation282 S.W.2d 315
PartiesPeter CHESWICK et al., Appellants, v. Fred FREEMAN, Appellee.
CourtTexas Court of Appeals

Peter P. Cheswick, Houston, for appellants.

Bradley & Geren, Groesbeck, for appellee.

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This suit was brought by Fred Freeman, as plaintiff, to enjoin the sale of a 50 acre tract of land situated in Limestone County, upon which execution had been levied, and which was claimed to be subject to a judgment lien in favor of defendants. Plaintiff contended the land was his homestead, and as such not subject to execution to satisfy a judgment. The Trial Court, without a jury, found that the land was plaintiff's homestead; declared the execution to be null and void; held that the judgment lien as to the 50 acres of land described was void; and granted a permanent injunction restraining the sale of same to satisfy the defendants' judgment.

Defendants appeal, contending that the Trial Court erred in holding that the land involved was plaintiff's homestead. The only question before this court is whether the land was in fact the plaintiff's homestead at the time of the execution, and, as such, exempt from forced sale.

The facts disclosed by the record from which it must be determined whether or not the 50 acres involved constitutes plaintiff's homestead are as follows: Plaintiff's father and mother owned a 67 acre tract of land of which the 50 acres here involved is part, together with a nonadjoining 60 acre tract of land. Plaintiff and his brother were their parents' only children and heirs. Plaintiff's father died in 1941 without a will. Following plaintiff's father's death in 1941 plaintiff and his wife, with plaintiff's mother's consent, made their home on the 67 acre tract and worked the land until 1945. In 1945 plaintiff and wife moved to Waco. In 1949 plaintiff's mother died without a will, after which plaintiff and his brother divided their parents' estate, plaintiff receiving the 50 acre tract here involved as his part, and the brother receiving the 17 acres balance in the 67 acre tract together with the 60 nonadjoining acres. Plaintiff, after acquiring the 50 acres in the 1949 division of property with his brother, intended to move back on it and occupy it and use it as his homestead. Defendants obtained a judgment in Harris County against plaintiff in May 1951, abstracted same in Limestone County in June 1951, and caused execution to be issued in August 1951, levying on plaintiff's 50 acres. Notice was posted by the Sheriff to sell plaintiff's property on 2 October 1951. Plaintiff filed this suit to enjoin such sale on 1 October 1951. Temporary restraining order and temporary injunction were granted, and upon trial on the merits in 1955 the injunction was made permanent. Plaintiff and his wife moved back to the 50 acres on 1 January 1952 and lived there until 1 March 1954, using same as their homestead. On 1 March 1954 plaintiff and wife again moved to Waco to get better employment. Plaintiff and wife had no other home and no other property at any time except his interest in his parents' estate, the 50 acres being such interest upon division of same. Plaintiff paid his poll tax and voted in Limestone County in 1948, 1950, and 1952, and from 1945 intended to return to the 50 acres in Linestone County and occupy it as his homestead, and did so return as above noted on 1 January 1952.

Our courts have given our constitutional and statutory provisions creating and defining the homestead a liberal construction and broad application; and have held that a tenant in common has the right, subject to coordinate rights of cotenants, to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • In re Moore, Bankruptcy No. 187-10247-11
    • United States
    • United States Bankruptcy Courts. Fifth Circuit. U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Northern District of Texas
    • 6 Diciembre 1988
    ...Lumber Co., 51 S.W.2d 831 (Tex.Civ. App.—Amarillo 1932, writ dism'd). It may attach to other interests as well. See, e.g., Cheswick v. Freeman, 282 S.W.2d 315, rev'd on other grounds, 287 S.W.2d 171 (Tex.Civ.App. — Waco 1955) (a tenancy in common); Moorhouse v. Crew, 273 S.W.2d 654 (Tex.Civ......
  • Cheswick v. Freeman
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • 25 Enero 1956
    ...which, upon final trial upon the merits, was made permanent. The trial court's judgment was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 282 S.W.2d 315. The sole question for decision is whether the 50-acre tract of land was the homestead of respondent and, as such, exempt from sale under the ex......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT