Chi., B. & Q. R. Co. v. Bernard
Decision Date | 30 June 1891 |
Citation | 49 N.W. 362,32 Neb. 306 |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
Parties | CHICAGO, B. & Q. R. CO. v. BERNARD. |
1. Held, that the evidence does not tend to show that the death of the plaintiff's intestate was caused by the negligence of the defendant.
2. When, in a case tried to a jury, there is no conflict in the evidence, and no inferences, about which reasonable men might differ, to be drawn from the facts and circumstances proved, the court may direct the verdict which shall be returned.
Error to district court, Gage county; BROADY, Judge.
Action by one Bernard, administrator of James Persinger, against the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, for negligent killing. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. Reversed.T. M. Marquett, J. W. Deweese, and Hazlett & Bates, for plaintiff in error.
Geo. B. Everitt and Hugh J. Dobbs, for defendant in error.
This is an action for damages by reason of the death of James Persinger, the defendant in error's intestate, caused by the alleged negligence of the railroad company. At the close of the trial the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and assessed the damages at the sum of $5,000. From the judgment entered upon the verdict the defendant brings the case to this court by proceedings in error. The principal question we are called to pass upon is whether there was any testimony in the case tending to sustain the verdict and judgment. It appears from the record that on the night of December 9, 1888, James Persinger left Lincoln on his first trip as a brakeman on the plaintiff in error's stock train, running between that place and Omaha. The train was pulled by two engines, and arrived at the station-house, near South Omaha, on the morning of December 10th, about 6 o'clock. At this place there is a side track, which was used for setting out cars, and for running cars to the South Omaha stock-yards. East of the station-house 385 feet is a bridge built over the Belt-Line Railroad. This bridge is 422 feet long, 18 feet above the gound at one end, and 30 feet at the other, and is a part of the company's main line. The bridge was not floored between the tracks, and had no railings or protection of any kind for a person standing or walking thereon. Persinger was the head brakeman, whose place was upon top of the cars near the front of the train, to give signals to the engineer, and help set the brakes. J. W. Moore was the rear brakeman, whose duty it was, after uncoupling the way car and the other cars that were not to go to the stock-yards, to throw the switch, so that the balance of the train could be backed in on the side track. Just before the rear of the train reached the station-house, the caboose and the two rear cars were cut off by Moore from the balance of the train, and left on the main track. The front portion of the train was stopped on the bridge. Moore gave the signal to Persinger, who was then on the top of the cars, to pull ahead so as to clear the switch, and, on Persinger repeating the signal to the engineers, the engines started. Moore discovered that the rear part of the train did not move, so he walked along the side of the cars to the bridge, where he climbed on top of one of the cars, and on walking forward he found that the train was broken in two. Persinger was standing on the third car from the break, when Moore walked up to him and said, “We are broken in two.” Persinger replied, “I guess not;” and signaled the engineers to go ahead. They both walked forward to the break in the train, which was over the bridge. Moore climbed down onto the bridge, when he discovered that the coupling-pin was broken. He left Persinger standing on the car, and went to the engine to get another pin. When he reached the engine, Taylor, one of the engineers, inquired of him where Persinger was. He replied that he left him on the cars, and Taylor said: “I am afraid he is down over the bridge.” Moore, on returning to the car where he left Persinger, discovered his body on the ground. He and the fireman went down to where Persinger was lying, and found that he was dead. The body was lying partly under the outer line of the bridge, and the lantern he carried was found two or three feet from his body. H. G. Taylor and L. S. Collier, the engineers, were the only witnesses who testified on the trial as to the manner of the accident. They were called to the witness stand by the defendant in error. Mr. Taylor testified on this branch of the case as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Miller v. Western Pac. R. Co.
... ... Co., 78 W.Va. 25, 88 ... S.E. 1060; Southern [73 Utah 454] Pac. Co ... v. Gloyd (C. C. A.) 138 F. 388; Chicago, B. & Q ... R. Co. v. Bernard, 32 Neb. 306, 49 N.W. 362 ... It is ... impracticable within reasonable limits to review all of these ... cases. The Laub Case, supra, ... ...
- Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. Barnard
- Blain v. Willson
-
Suiter v. Park Nat. Bank of Chi.
...draw different conclusions, and it should have been submitted to the jury. Houck v. Gue, 30 Neb. 113, 46 N. W. Rep. 280; Railroad Co. v. Barnard, 32 Neb. 306, 49 N. W. Rep. 362. As there must be a new trial, we do not care to comment on this testimony, or say anything which might be used to......