Chiaramonte v. Coppola

Decision Date01 February 2011
Citation915 N.Y.S.2d 560,81 A.D.3d 426
PartiesTeresa CHIARAMONTE, etc., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Paolo T. COPPOLA, M.D., Defendant-Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Silverson, Pareres & Lombardi, LLP, New York (Rachel H. Poritz of counsel), for appellant.

Weinberg & Gerontianos, P.C., New York (Melissa A. Weinberg of counsel), for respondent.

ANDRIAS, J.P., SWEENY, MOSKOWITZ, DEGRASSE, ABDUS-SALAAM, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucindo Suarez, J.), entered January 28, 2009, which, in an action alleging medical malpractice and wrongful death, granted plaintiff's motion to vacate the default judgment entered against her and reinstated the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied and the default judgment reinstated. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

The motion to vacate the default judgment, which was entered based upon plaintiff's failure to appear at a scheduled status conference ( see 22 NYCRR 202.27[b] ), was improperly granted since plaintiff failed to show a meritorious cause of action. The affidavit of plaintiff's purported expert, whose identity cannot be discerned from the affidavit, was insufficient since the expert failed to make factual allegations, describe the extent of his or her knowledge of the matter, or state with specificity the observations as to the procedures or treatments performed and defendant's alleged deviations from the acceptable standards of medical care. Nor does the expert explain how the alleged departures from those standards contributed to the decedent's death ( see DeRosario v. New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 22 A.D.3d 270, 802 N.Y.S.2d 406 [2005]; compare Kaufman v. Bauer, 36 A.D.3d 481, 482-483, 830 N.Y.S.2d 23 [2007] ).

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Torres v. Metro N. R.R.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • December 23, 2016
    ...at a scheduled conference, 22 N.Y.C.R.R. § 202.27(b); Biton v. Turco, 88 A.D.3d 519, 519 (1st Dep't 2011); Chiaramonte v. Coppola, 81 A.D.3d 426, 426 (1st Dep't 2011); Aaron v. Greenberg & Reicher, LLP, 68 A.D.3d 533, 534 (1st Dep't 2009); Espinoza v. Concordia Intl. Forwarding Corp., 32 A.......
  • People v. Marino
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 3, 2011
  • Leff v. TIAA-CREF Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 1, 2011
  • Biton v. Turco
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 13, 2011
    ...motion to vacate the default on the ground that she failed to show a meritorious cause of action ( see e.g. Chiaramonte v. Coppola, 81 A.D.3d 426, 915 N.Y.S.2d 560 [2011]; DeRosario v. New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 22 A.D.3d 270, 802 N.Y.S.2d 406 [2005]; Fink v. Antell,19 A.D.3d 215,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT