Chicago, M. & P.S. Ry. Co. v. Slosser
Decision Date | 11 December 1914 |
Docket Number | 11992. |
Citation | 82 Wash. 467,144 P. 706 |
Court | Washington Supreme Court |
Parties | CHICAGO, M. & P. S. RY. CO. v. SLOSSER et ux. |
Department 2. Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County; E. H Sullivan, Judge.
Condemnation proceedings by the Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Company against Joseph P. Slosser and wife. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. Dismissed.
O. C Moore and Codd, Hutchinson & Codd, all of Spokane, for appellants.
F. M Dudley and F. M. Barkwill, both of Seattle, for respondent.
On May 17, 1910, the respondent, Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Company, instituted this proceeding against the appellants to condemn for railway purposes a leasehold interest held by the appellants in certain described real property situated in the city of Spokane. In due course of the proceedings a judgment of public use and public necessity was entered, and the cause tried before a jury on the question of damages. The jury awarded the appellants the sum of $650, the verdict being returned on January 20, 1911. On March 25, 1911, without the formal entry of a judgment on the verdict, the respondent paid into court for the use of the appellants the amount of the award, with costs. This sum the appellants, by their attorneys, withdrew from the registry of the court on October 19, 1911, giving a receipt therefor, reciting that the same was received in full satisfaction of the verdict in the condemnation proceedings. No further proceedings were had in the cause until October 15, 1913, when the following judgment was entered:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Bremerton Bridge Co. v. Superior Court for Kitsap County
... ... order. State ex rel. Pagett v. Superior Court, 46 ... Wash. 35, 89 P. 178; Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Ry ... Co. v. Slosser, 82 Wash. 467, 144 P. 706; Spokane ... ...
-
State ex rel. Northwestern Elec. Co. v. Superior Court for Clark County
... ... [No. 1, of Stevens County] v. McLeish, 63 Wash. 331, 115 ... P. 508; Chicago, M. & P. S. R. Co. v. Slosser, 82 ... Wash. 467, 144 P. 706. The statute, section 1002 of ... ...
-
State v. Superior Court for Grays Harbor County
... ... provisions of the last act this court, in the case of ... Chicago, M. & P. S. R. Co. v. Slosser, 82 Wash. 467, ... 144 P. 706, said: ... 'The statute ... ...
-
Spokane Valley Power Co. v. Northern P. Ry. Co.
...& M. R. R. Co. v. B. B. & E. R. Co., 29 Wash. 491, 69 P. 1107, 92 Am. St. Rep. 907; North Coast R. Co. v. Gentry, supra; Chicago, etc., R. Co. v. Slosser, supra. In the last case said: 'While the judgment of appropriation is the final judgment in the sense that it comes last in the series, ......