Childs v. United States, 96-53.
Decision Date | 02 February 1954 |
Docket Number | No. 96-53.,96-53. |
Citation | 118 F. Supp. 364 |
Parties | CHILDS v. UNITED STATES. |
Court | U.S. Claims Court |
Harry B. Childs, pro se.
Lawrence S. Smith, Washington, D. C., with whom was Warren E. Burger, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant.
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and LITTLETON, WHITAKER and MADDEN, Judges.
The plaintiff, a railway postal transportation clerk, sues for overtime pay because of four extra trips which he made in December 1952. These trips aggregate 29 hours for which he claims overtime pay in the sum of $91.35.
The pay of railway postal clerks is regulated by statute, the pertinent part of which is as follows:
39 U.S.C.A. § 866.
All of plaintiff's service was performed on a class B run, as to which the statute provides a layoff-period allowance of 1 hour and 35 minutes per day, leaving a working schedule of the remaining 6 hours and 25 minutes which constitutes the working time.
In practical operation a record is kept by the Post Office Department, and when the daily average time on a trip is less than 6 hours and 25 minutes a deficiency is noted. When a sufficient deficiency is accumulated the clerk is assigned to an extra trip to make up the deficiency. If at the end of any month the overtime credit exceeds the deficiency, the clerk is paid one and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Selman v. United States
...avoids for fear of encroaching on the province of the legislature. Ricker v. United States, supra; Childs v. United States, 118 F. Supp. 364, 365, 127 Ct.Cl. 425, 428 (1954). Nor is defendant's argument strengthened in this regard by citation of a Naval regulation making formal "detail" to ......