Chin v. State

Decision Date19 March 1928
Docket NumberCriminal 664
Citation265 P. 621,33 Ariz. 419
PartiesSHEW CHIN, Appellant, v. STATE, Respondent
CourtArizona Supreme Court

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Mohave. E. Elmo Bollinger, Judge. Affirmed.

Mr. L. L. Wallace and Messrs. Struckmeyer, Jennings & Strouss, for Appellant.

Mr. John W. Murphy, Attorney General, Mr. Frank J. Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, and Mr. J. Hubert Smith, County Attorney (Mr. W. E. Patterson and Mr. J. J. Sweeney, of Counsel), for the State.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Shew Chin, was informed against for the crime of murder jointly with B. W. L. Sam, Gee Long, Jew Har and Wong Lung, but was tried separately, and the jury returned a verdict of murder in the first degree, fixing the death penalty. He has appealed from the verdict and the judgment rendered thereon. The record is practically the same as that in the case of B. W. L. Sam v. State, No. 663, ante, p. 383, 265 P. 609, and it was stipulated by counsel that the cases should be briefed, argued and considered by the court together. For the reasons stated in the Sam case, supra, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • State v. Cutting
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • September 13, 1971
    ...the trial court. State v. Telavera, 76 Ariz. 183, 261 P.2d 997 (1953); Sam v. State, 33 Ariz. 383, 265 P. 609 (1928); Shew Chin v. State, 33 Ariz. 419, 265 P. 621 (1928); Gee Long v. State, 33 Ariz. 420, 265 P. 622 (1928). It is within defendant's control as to what the record on appeal wil......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT