Chinchilla v. Star Cas. Ins. Co., 3D01-3121.
| Decision Date | 06 November 2002 |
| Docket Number | No. 3D01-3121.,3D01-3121. |
| Citation | 833 So.2d 804 |
| Parties | Idalia CHINCHILLA, Appellant, v. STAR CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Lidsky, Vaccaro & Montes, and Leonardo Bueno, for appellant.
Aragon, Burlington, Weil, and Crockett, and Paul J. Schwiep, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and RAMIREZ, J., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.
Idalia Chinchilla appeals from a non-final order denying class certification in her suit against Star Casualty Insurance Company to recover unearned premiums. We affirm because Chinchilla lacks standing to represent the plaintiff class.
Chinchilla purchased automobile insurance from Star on June 10, 1995. On August 31, 1995, Star sent her a "three option" letter informing Chinchilla that she needed to pay an additional premium of $10 by September 30, 1995, in order to keep the policy in force. She could also choose to cancel her policy by October 12, 1995, and demand a refund of any unearned premium. If she did neither, her policy would be cancelled as of October 12, 1995, and any unearned premium would be refunded. Chinchilla, however, never received this "three option" letter. Star cancelled her policy on October 15, 1995.
In December 1995, Chinchilla was involved in an automobile accident. She learned that the policy had been cancelled when she made a claim for approximately $10,000 in accident-related medical expenses. Chinchilla's attorney wrote to Star on February 29, 1996, demanding that it afford coverage or return the unearned premium.
After determining that Chinchilla could reasonably have believed she had paid all premiums due, and wishing to avoid litigation, Star responded on March 8, 1996, that it agreed to reinstate the policy and provide coverage for the accident. Chinchilla, however, would not accept yes for an answer. Instead of accepting coverage, Chinchilla brought a class action suit on behalf of persons who, among other things, had their policies cancelled for non-payment of the additional premiums and who were charged a premium beyond the cancellation date stated in the "three-option" letter. Chinchilla's individual claim was for less than $100.
The trial court denied class certification finding that Chinchilla lacked standing to be the class representative because Star had reinstated her policy so that coverage existed to pay her medical bills, just as Chinchilla had demanded in her February 29, 1996 letter. The court also found that Chinchilla was an improper class representative because her claims were not typical of the purported class, the recipients of "three-option" letters whose policies were cancelled and the incorrect amount refunded. The trial court further found that Chinchilla was an inadequate representative because unique and individualized defenses were available against her which...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
American Medical Sec., Inc. v. Parker
...(non-class) lawsuits against [Defendant] for the same claims advanced by Plaintiffs herein"). 5. See Chinchilla v. Star Cas. Ins. Co., 833 So.2d 804, 805 (Fla.App.2002) (when Chinchilla's insurance policy was reinstated for reasons other than to "pick [her] Off" as the class representative,......
-
Ahearn v. Mayo Clinic
...414 U.S. 488, 494, 94 S.Ct. 669, 675, 38 L.Ed.2d 674, 682 (1974) ) (footnote and citations omitted). See also Chinchilla v. Star Cas. Ins. Co., 833 So.2d 804 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) ; Graham v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 813 So.2d 273 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) ; Syna v. Shell Oil Co., 241 So.2d 458 (......
-
Ferreiro v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
...because we previously granted her declaratory relief. In support of its position, Philadelphia relies on Chinchilla v. Star Casualty Insurance Co., 833 So.2d 804 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), Ramon v. Aries Insurance Co., 769 So.2d 1053 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), Taran, 685 So.2d at 1006, Baptist Hospital, ......
-
South Motor Company of Dade County v. Poltarack, 3D07-2697.
...So.2d 860 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Neighborhood Health P'ship, Inc. v. Fischer, 913 So.2d 703 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Chinchilla v. Star Cas. Ins. Co., 833 So.2d 804 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Braun v. Campbell, 827 So.2d 261 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Kendrick, 822 So.2d 516 (F......