Chipman v. Chonin, 91-992
| Decision Date | 14 April 1992 |
| Docket Number | No. 91-992,91-992 |
| Citation | 597 So.2d 363 |
| Parties | Nolan P. CHIPMAN, Appellant, v. Neil CHONIN, et al., Appellees. 597 So.2d 363, 17 Fla. L. Week. D975 |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Nolan P. Chipman, in pro. per.
Rumberger, Kirk, Caldwell & Wechsler, P.A., F. Laurens Brock and Jodi R. Young, Miami, for appellees.
Before NESBITT, JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.
Nolan Chipman appeals from a final summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants in a legal malpractice/breach of contract case. We affirm.
A party cannot recover damages for legal malpractice unless it is shown that the lawyer neglected a reasonable duty which was the proximate cause of the client's loss. Davenport v. Store, 528 So.2d 45 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). In breach of contract actions, a plaintiff may recover only if the damages were a proximate result of the breach. Tuttle/White Constructors, Inc. v. Montgomery Elevator Co., 385 So.2d 98 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). Chipman alleged in his complaint that the defendant's withdrawal as counsel caused him to lose monetary damages in an age discrimination case. However, the record is devoid of any evidence which would support this claim. 1 Any loss of these damages must be attributable to Chipman himself, since he chose to voluntarily accept his former employer's settlement offer. Accordingly, the trial court correctly entered final summary judgment in favor of the defendants. See Vukovich v. Leo, 447 So.2d 1012 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) ().
Affirmed.
1 The record indicates that: (1) the defendant properly withdrew from the case ten months before trial was scheduled; (2) Chipman engaged new counsel; and (3) Chipman fired his new counsel approximately four weeks before the start of trial.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Usa Interactive v. Dow Lohnes & Albertson
...summary judgment in breach of fiduciary case on lack of causation against lawyer based on undisputed facts); Chipman v. Chonin, 597 So.2d 363, 364 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (per curiam) (stating that "where reasonable minds cannot differ, proximate cause becomes a question of law."); Chadwick v. C......
-
Border Collie Rescue, Inc. v. Ryan
...1210 (M.D.Fla. 2002). A plaintiff may only recover if the damages are a proximate result of the material breach. Chipman v. Chonin, 597 So.2d 363, 364 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (citation Carter's assertions in his affidavit concerning Merwin's purported actions of stealing plaintiffs' proprietary ......
-
Cibran Enterprises v. Bp Products North America
..."In breach of contract actions, a plaintiff may recover only if the damages were a proximate result of the breach." Chipman v. Chonin, 597 So.2d 363, 364 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (citing Tuttle/White Constructors, Inc. v. Montgomery Elevator Co., 385 So.2d 98 (Fla. 5th DCA In this case, Mr. Cibra......
-
Tardif v. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
...are: (1) the existence of a contract, (2) a breach of the contract, and (3) damages resulting from the breach.”); Chipman v. Chonin, 597 So.2d 363, 364 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1992) (“In breach of contract actions, a plaintiff may recover only if the damages were a proximate result of the breach.”); ......
-
1-5 Third Predicate: Attorney's Negligence as Proximate Cause of Loss
...in negligence cases 'the determination of proximate cause is ordinarily a question that should be left for a jury.'"); Chipman v. Chonin, 597 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 3d Dist. Ct. App. 1992) (summary judgment in favor of lawyer affirmed because proximate cause was a question of law where lawyer wit......