Christner v. Eason

Decision Date06 June 1978
Docket NumberNo. 55579,55579
Citation245 S.E.2d 489,146 Ga.App. 139
PartiesCHRISTNER v. EASON.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

A. W. Touchton, Lake Park, for appellant.

Tillman, Brice, McTier, Coleman & Talley, George T. Talley, Valdosta, for appellee.

SMITH, Judge.

The trial court erroneously granted Eason's motion for judgment on the pleadings, and we reverse.

Christner, the appellant, filed this suit against appellee, a policeman. Both parties characterize the case as one sounding in libel. Appellant alleged in her complaint that she was involved in a serious automobile collision and that appellee, who was assigned to investigate the collision, prepared a report which falsely stated her running a red light was the cause of the accident. Appellant also alleged appellee made up the damaging report with the knowledge that it was false. Neither party introduced evidence of any kind, and the court granted appellee's motion for judgment on the pleadings. By brief attached to the motion, appellee alleged as a complete defense that his report was a privileged communication, a statement "made bona fide in the performance of a public duty." Code § 105-709(1).

" After the pleadings are closed but within such time as not to delay the trial, any party may move for judgment on the pleadings." CPA § 12(c) (Code Ann. § 81A-112(c)). " 'For the purposes of the motion, all well-pleaded material allegations of the opposing party's pleadings are to be taken as true, and all allegations of the moving party which have been denied are taken as false. Conclusions of law are not admitted. Judgment on the pleadings may be granted only if, on the facts as so admitted, the moving party is clearly entitled to judgment.' 2A Moore's Federal Practice 2269, § 12.15. Thus the question here is whether the undisputed facts appearing from the pleadings show the defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." Gulf American Fire & C. C. v. Harper, 117 Ga.App. 356(1), 160 S.E.2d 663 (1968). Here, whether appellee reported bona fide is disputed in the pleadings, and it was error to conclude his communication was privileged as a matter of law.

Appellee also asserts as grounds for affirmance that appellant failed to plead all the elements of a cause of action in libel. Failure to plead a cause of action, however, would not be proper basis for granting judgment on the pleadings. "A complaint is not required to set forth a cause of action, but need only set forth a claim for relief . . . 'If, within the framework of the complaint, evidence may be introduced which will sustain a grant of relief to the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 cases
  • Williams v. Dekalb Cnty.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • July 1, 2022
    ...(4) (a), 555 S.E.2d 800 (2001) ; Sulejman v. Marinello , 217 Ga. App. 319, 320 (2), 457 S.E.2d 251 (1995) ; Christner v. Eason , 146 Ga. App. 139, 140, 245 S.E.2d 489 (1978). The case upon which Seaboard relied, White v. Augusta Motel Hotel Investment Co. , 119 Ga. App. 351 (1), 167 S.E.2d ......
  • Loney v. Primerica Life Ins. Co., A97A2156.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 20, 1998
    ...relief under any state of facts which could be proved in support of his claim.' (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Christner v. Eason, 146 Ga.App. 139, 140, 245 S.E.2d 489. See also Sulejman v. Marinello, 217 Ga.App. 319, 320(2), 457 S.E.2d 251." Ransom v. Fleet Fin., 219 Ga. App. 817(2),......
  • ALW Marketing Corp. v. McKinney
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • July 9, 1992
    ...and citations omitted.) Abacus, Inc. v. Hebron Baptist Church, Inc., 201 Ga.App. 376, 411 S.E.2d 113 (1991); Christner v. Eason, 146 Ga.App. 139-140, 245 S.E.2d 489 (1978). Taking the allegations of the complaint as true, we conclude for the reasons stated in Division 2 that the restrictive......
  • Lathem v. Hestley
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • March 15, 1999
    ...type of litigation involved. See Dillingham v. Doctors Clinic, P.A., 236 Ga. 302, 303, 223 S.E.2d 625 (1976); Christner v. Eason, 146 Ga.App. 139, 140, 245 S.E.2d 489 (1978). A constructive trust is one form of implied trust, and is defined by OCGA § 53-12-93 as "a trust implied whenever th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT