Christopher v. Mungen
Decision Date | 10 December 1913 |
Parties | CHRISHTOPHER et al. v. MUNGEN et al. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Duval County; Geo. Couper Gibbs, Judge.
Bill by Jane Mungen and another against John G. Christopher and others. From the decree, defendants appeal. Affirmed.
See also, 61 Fla. 513, 55 So. 273.
Additional Syllabus by Editorial Staff
Syllabus by the Court
Where a trustee of real estate takes no title that may descend to his heirs or to his administrator, a deed covering the land made by the administrator and heirs of the trustee conveys no title.
A grantee in a deed conveying no title will not be heard to complain that possible rights in the grantor therein have been invaded.
In a suit for partition, where the only valid claim of the defendants is through E., who has only the same rights in the property that the complainant J. has, both E. and J. being children of the deceased owner of the property by slave marriages, the defendants, as the successors in title to E cannot complain of an adjudication that E. had equal rights with J., when the defendants averred that neither E. nor J took as heirs of the father, nor are any vested rights of the defendants invaded by according to J. equal rights with them in the property, since the defendants have only the rights of E., and J. and E. take equal shares under the same statutes allowing them to inherit from their father.
One claiming title under a child of a slave marriage, as against another child of a slave marriage, cannot complain that this court at one time held that a certain statute did not confer inheritable blood upon such offspring and subsequently held that a later statute conferring such rights was retroactive except where vested rights were invaded, where the title of both must stand or fall together.
When the title of two daughters of a slave marriage depend entirely upon a statute and a decision of this court, the grantee of one of them will not be heard to complain that the same statute and decision may be void as interfering with rights vested under former decisions.
The testimony examined in this case and found to sustain the contention of the appellees that Jane Mungen was the child of a slave marriage and cohabitation, and that she had inheritable blood under chapter 4749, Acts 1899.
The testimony examined and found not to sustain the contention of the appellants that appellees are barred from sustaining this suit by the alleged laches of the appellees in bringing it.
COUNSEL H. H. Buckman and Bisbee & Bedell, all of Jacksonville, for appellants.
N. P. Bryan, J. T. G. Crawford, Baker & Baker, Van C. Swearingen, and Axtell & Rinehart, all of Jacksonville, for appellees.
The interest of the Land Mortgage Bank of Florida and Bessie A. Martin were alleged in the bill to be subordinate to the rights of complainants, and a decree pro confesso was entered against them. Appellant Thompson filed a motion alleging he was not aggrieved by the final decree, and praying that it be confirmed as to him. The only questions, therefore, before us are those affecting the rights and interest of John G. Christopher, Julia A. Wilson, and H. A. Wilson, her husband, and the McLeans. An answer was filed by appellants, to which there was a replication, and, besides the documentary evidence filed, several hundred pages of testimony was taken. On final hearing the court entered the following final decree:
'(7) That the decree pro confesso heretofore entered in this cause against the defendant Bessie A. Martin be and the same is hereby confirmed, and that the said Bessie A. Martin is not seised of any right, title, or interest in or to the premises hereinafter described, or any part thereof.
'(8) That as to the defendant William A. McLean the equities are with the complainants, and that the said William A. McLean is not seised of any right, title, or interest in or to the premises herinafter described, or any part thereof.
'If is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the complainant Jane Mungen and the defendant Julia A. Wilson, wife of H. A. Wilson, are each entitled to and seised and possessed of one-half of the following described lands in fee simple; that is to say, all those certain lots, pieces, or parcels of land in Duval county, Fla., particularly described as follows: All of lot or tract 3 not hereinabove particularly described, and also lots 1 and 2 in block 33, lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 in block 34, lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 in block 35, lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 in block 37, lots 1 and 2 in block 38, of East Lewisville, according to map thereof recorded in plat book 1, page 25, of said Public Records in Duval county, Fla.
'And it is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the complainant Jane Mungen and the defendants John G. Christopher and Julia A. Wilson, wife of H. A. Wilson, are entitled to and seised and possessed of the following described lands, in fee simple, in the proportions of one-half, three-eighths, and one-eighth, respectively; that is to say, all those certain lots, pieces, or parcels of land in Duval county, Fla., particularly described as follows: All that part of the certain subdivision of said county known as East Lewisville, situate in the northeastern part of the city of Jacksonville, Duval county, Fla., lying and being east of the Shell road or Talleyrand avenue, according to a map recorded in plat book 1, page 25, of the Public Records of said Duval county, Fla.; and also all of lot 4, block 29, not hereinabove described, lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of block 23, and the east 126 feet of block 24, of said subdivision, according to said map.
'It is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that a division and partition of said premises be made; that W. R. Sebring, A. W Palmer, and A. C. Ulmer be...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Wilder v. Punta Gorda State Bank
... ... consideration. Florida East Coast R. Co. v. Geiger, ... 66 Fla. 582, 64 So. 238; Christopher v. Mungen, 66 ... Fla. 467, 63 So. 923; First Nat. Bank v. Ulmer, 66 ... Fla. 68, 63 So. 145; A. R. Harper Piano Co. v. Seaboard ... Air Line Ry., ... ...
-
Burdine v. Sewell
... ... merits. See First Nat. Bank v. Ulmer, 66 Fla. 68, 63 ... So. 145; Cooney Eckstein Co. v. King, 69 Fla. 246, ... 67 So. 918; Christopher v. Mungen, 66 Fla. 467, 478, ... 63 So. 923; Fairlie v. Scott, 88 Fla. 229, 102 So ... ELLIS, ... J., ... ...
-
Payne v. Payne
... ... forbidden by law should be liberally construed to carry out ... the beneficent public policy of the state. Christopher v ... Mungen, 61 Fla. 513, 55 So. 273; Christopher v ... Mungen, 66 Fla. 467, 63 So. 923; Christopher v ... Mungen, 71 Fla. 545, 71 So. 625 ... ...
-
Christopher v. Mungen
...the demurrer was affirmed, and in the second the decree was affirmed. Christopher v. Mungen, 61 Fla. 513, 55 So. 273; Christopher v. Mungen, 66 Fla. 467, 63 So. 923. report as made by the commissioners appointed to make partition of the lands described in the bill shows that as to the lands......