Ciabotti v. Milo, 83-285
| Decision Date | 14 June 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 83-285,83-285 |
| Citation | 432 So.2d 792 |
| Parties | Robert CIABOTTI, Appellant, v. Vincent MILO, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Appeal from a non-final order from Circuit Court, Dade County; James C. Henderson.
Lawrence Bunin, Hollywood, for appellant.
Guren, Merritt, Udell, Sogg & Cohen and Wesley R. Lauer, Miami, for appellee.
Before BASKIN, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
Reversed. A disputed claim for money damages does not afford a sufficient basis for the grant of injunctive relief. Stewart v. Manget, 132 Fla. 498, 181 So. 370 (1938); Supreme Service Station Corp. v. Telecredit Service Center, Inc., 424 So.2d 844 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) [7 FLW 2494]; Oxford International Bank & Trust, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, 374 So.2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. dism. 383 So.2d 1199 (Fla.1980).
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Angora Enterprises v. Condominium Ass'n of Lakeside Village, Inc., 82-180
-
Ramos v. Stabinski & Funt, P.A., 86-1208
...and contingent claim for money damages does not constitute, by itself, a sufficient basis for injunctive relief. Ciabotti v. Milo, 432 So.2d 792 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Digaeteno v. Perotti, 374 So.2d 1015 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Oxford International Bank and Trust, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, F......