Citizen's Life Ins. Co. v. Boyle

Citation139 Ky. 1,129 S.W. 303
PartiesCITIZENS' LIFE INS. CO. v. BOYLE et ux.
Decision Date17 June 1910
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County, Chancery Branch, Second Division.

"To be officially reported."

Action by Boyle G. Boyle and wife against the Citizens' Life Insurance Company. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Helm Bruce and Sidney Smith, for appellant.

Helm &amp Helm, for appellees.

CLAY C.

Boyle G. Boyle and Laura G. Boyle, his wife, instituted this action against appellant, Citizens' Life Insurance Company asking a mandatory injunction compelling appellant to reinstate a certain life insurance policy issued to appellee Boyle G. Boyle, and made payable to his wife. A demurrer was sustained to appellant's answer, and judgment then rendered in favor of appellees. From that judgment this appeal is prosecuted.

The petition is as follows:

"Plaintiffs state that the defendant, Citizens' Life Insurance Company, is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Kentucky, with power to sue and be sued in its corporate name, to contract and be contracted with, and to enter into contracts of insurance insuring the lives of persons against death, and receive from such persons premiums, and generally to do and perform all the usual and necessary acts of a life insurance company organized under the laws of the state of Kentucky. The plaintiffs are husband and wife. Plaintiff Laura G. Boyle is named as beneficiary of a life insurance policy issued by the defendant hereinafter set forth, and joins and unites herein so far as she may be interested.
"Plaintiff Boyle G. Boyle says that: In Louisville, Ky. on the 1st day of May, 1905, he having previously been solicited to do so, and having complied with all the requirements to that end, entered into a contract of insurance with the defendant. There was issued to him by the defendant a life insurance policy of the Citizens' Life Insurance Company, No. 940, for the sum of $10,000, payable at the death of this plaintiff. Said policy provides that this plaintiff as the insured shall annually pay to the defendant, the Citizens' Life Insurance Company, the sum of $182 the 1st day of May, 1905, and on the 1st day of May in each succeeding year for 10 years, but with one month's grace for the payment of said premiums after the first, less the dividends credited thereon; and may at the end of 10 years from the date of same renew said policy for a similar period or periods of 10 years each, paying during such following periods a rate of premium as shown upon the company's tables for the age which the plaintiff shall then have attained at the beginning of such period. It was and is further provided in said policy that the premiums, as due, may be paid in half yearly or quarterly installments, but, should this plaintiff die during any year, that the unpaid premiums for such year should be deducted from the principal of such policy payable to plaintiff's estate, and, in order to make certain the amount payable as such semiannual or quarterly premiums, as a part of said agreement there was attached to said policy a table showing that the semiannual premiums due on said policy of plaintiff amounted to the sum of $94.60, and the quarterly premium due thereon to the sum of $48.20. Plaintiff files herewith as part hereof said original life insurance policy No. 940, marked Exhibit No. 1.
"As a part of said contract of insurance, and of even date therewith, defendant, the Citizens' Life Insurance Company, entered into a collateral agreement with this plaintiff, under and by the terms of which agreement the defendant promised and agreed in consideration of this plaintiff's becoming a member of the department of information and inspection of said company to pay to plaintiff the sum of 40 cents on each and every $1,000 of premiums it received in cash during each year, on insurance written in Kentucky, from the date of the policy up to and including the year 1915, so long as such premiums should be paid, said compensation to be credited upon the premium due from plaintiff, and further provides: "The amount of premiums received during each calendar year shall be ascertained in January of each succeeding year, and said compensation shall be paid each year on the anniversary of the date of this agreement.' Said certificate of membership in the department of information and inspection is filed herewith, as part hereof, marked 'Exhibit No. 2.' Plaintiff has kept and performed all of the obligations imposed upon or required of him pursuant to said agreement of membership in the department of information and inspection, and further paid in cash the first annual premium on said policy of $182 on the 1st day of May, 1906, and the 1st day of May, 1907, less the amount of dividends or compensation to which this plaintiff was entitled, and which he received each year under his said appointment in said department of information and inspection. "The defendant from the date of said policy, and at each renewal thereafter until this year, has given to this plaintiff notice of the time at which the premiums due from this plaintiff to defendant were payable, and informed this plaintiff of the amount of compensation apportioned to this plaintiff as a member of the department of information and inspection. The sums so allowed to plaintiff as compensation varied greatly, and largely increased from year to year, and plaintiff did not know, and had no means of knowing, what sum such compensation so allowed to this plaintiff amounted to, or how much was to be deducted from the premium payable by him to said company, under the terms of said life insurance policy.

"Plaintiff says that the defendant habitually and customarily gives notice to all of its policy holders of the time when the premiums are payable and of the amount of compensation apportioned to such policy holder, and during the period of grace sends additional notice by mail and has a representative call in person to collect such premium. Plaintiff further says that it is the universal custom and usage of all insurance companies doing business in Kentucky to give notice in writing a reasonable time before such premiums become due to their several policy holders of the amount of such premiums, and, when such policy holder is entitled to receive a dividend or distribution of surplus, to advise such policy holder from whom a premium is due of the amount apportioned or allowed to such policy holder for such distribution of the dividend to be credited upon such premium, and to give the notice and make the demand during the days of grace as stated above. Notwithstanding plaintiff's place of business is only about a hundred yards from the defendant's chief place of business, and plaintiff is personally acquainted with W. H. Gregory, president of said company, and many of its officers and agents, and said company had been informed only three or four months ago that plaintiff did not desire to change the form of his policy, as he was then requested to do, and that plaintiff desired to and would keep up and renew the policy herein sued upon, the defendant, the Citizens' Life Insurance Company, willfully and intentionally wholly failed to give any notice whatever of the time when his premium herein was due or payable or the amount of compensation apportioned the preceding January 1st on the business written during the preceding year on which cash premiums had been received by said company to this plaintiff, and plaintiff did not know, and had no means of knowing, what amount of premium it was necessary for him to pay to keep said policy in force. He was at all times ready, willing, and able to pay said premium when and as soon as plaintiff was informed of the amount of compensation awarded to him, pursuant to said contract for his services as a member of such information and inspection department of said company.

"Plaintiff carries, and has had for years, other policies of insurance in other companies, and always received notice of the time when premiums were due from such companies, as well as heretofore from this defendant, and of the amount of the surplus or dividends or compensation apportioned to him under his policies, and the plaintiff relied upon being informed by the defendant of the time when his premium was due and the amount of the compensation which he was entitled to receive as a credit upon such premium due for the year beginning May 1, 1908. On June 13, 1908, the president of the defendant company called this plaintiff by telephone to know why plaintiff had allowed his policy herein sued upon to lapse. Plaintiff immediately responded that he did not intend to let said policy lapse, but was waiting until the premium was due and to ascertain the amount of compensation which would be credited upon the premium in order to pay to the defendant the balance. On June 15, 1908, for the first time, plaintiff was informed of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Barber v. Hartford Life Ins. Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 9, 1919
    ...and should have applied it to the assessment or to reduce it. National Council of Junior Order v. Thomas, 163 Ky. 364; Citizens Life Ins. Co. v. Boyle, 139 Ky. 1; on Benefit Societies, sec. 71. (4) By amending its answer, after this case was reversed and remanded, and pleading the failure t......
  • Inter-Southern Life Insurance Co. v. Omer
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky
    • May 12, 1931
    ...hands which are sufficient to satisfy a quarterly or semiannual premium to that purpose and prevent a forfeiture. Citizens' Life Ins. Co. v. Boyle, 139 Ky. 1, 129 S.W. 303. See annotations, 6 A.L.R. We find only a domestic case and one other (and that rested upon it) directly in point as to......
  • Inter-Southern Life Ins. Co. v. Omer
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • May 12, 1931
    ... ... sufficient to satisfy a quarterly or semiannual premium to ... that purpose and prevent a forfeiture. Citizens' Life ... Ins. Co. v. Boyle, 139 Ky. 1, 129 S.W. 303. See ... annotations, 6 A.L.R. 1400 ...          We find ... only a domestic case ... ...
  • Commonwealth Life Ins. Co. v. Gault's Adm'rs
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • June 22, 1934
    ... ... were derived." Rogers v. Union Benevolent Soc., ... 111 Ky. 598, 64 S.W. 444, 23 Ky. Law Rep. 928, 55 L. R. A ... 605; Citizens' Life Ins. Co. v. Boyle, 139 Ky ... 1, 129 S.W. 303; National Council J. O. A. M. v ... Thomas, 163 Ky. 364, 173 S.W. 813; Supreme Council, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT