Citizens' Mercantile Co. v. Easom

Decision Date19 July 1924
Docket Number4356.
Citation123 S.E. 883,158 Ga. 604
PartiesCITIZENS' MERCANTILE CO. v. EASOM.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Syllabus by the Court.

The payment of a debt secured by deed to land revests in the grantor in such deed such interest and title therein as can be levied upon under an execution issuing upon a judgment junior in date to such deed, without a reconveyance of the land to the grantor, and, in case of cancellation, without the record of the cancellation of the security deed.

(a) Quære, whether an entry upon a security deed in which full payment of the secured debt is acknowledged and cancellation of the deed is authorized is such cancellation as is required under section 3309 of the Civil Code.

Where one purchases land incumbered by two security deeds and by a judgment junior to such security deeds, on which execution has issued and has been properly recorded on the general execution docket, under an agreement by which he is to pay for the land the amount of the debts secured by such deeds and in pursuance of such agreement does pay such debts, but receives from the seller no conveyance, and thereafter the land is levied upon under such execution, the purchaser is not entitled to be subrogated to the rights of the holders of such debts; there being no agreement between such holders and himself, or between the debtor and himself, by which he is to be subrogated to the rights and titles of the grantees in such deeds, the purchaser having constructive, if not actual notice of the existence of such junior judgment.

Error from Superior Court, Early County; M. J. Yeomans, Judge.

Execution proceeding by the Citizens' Mercantile Company against Mrs. R. A. Easom, in which Otho Easom filed claim. Judgment for claimant, and plaintiff brings error. Reversed.

Russell C.J., dissenting.

An execution in favor of the Citizens' Mercantile Company against Mrs. R. A. Easom was levied upon a described tract of land as the property of the defendant in fi. fa. Otho Easom filed his claim to this property. By agreement between the parties the trial of the claim was submitted to the trial judge, without the intervention of a jury, upon an agreed statement of facts and the testimony of the claimant. That statement of facts is as follows:

"On December 29, 1914, the defendant in fi. fa., Mrs. R A. Easom, who is the same person as Mrs. Emma Easom, acquired title, under a deed made to her as grantee by one J. S. Barnett as grantor, said deed being recorded on February 19, 1915 in Deed Book 30, page 13, in the office of the clerk of the superior court of Early county, to the following described real estate: A tract of land in the twenty-sixth district of Early county, Ga., containing 65 acres, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the east line of lot of land No. 124 in said district, said point being 22 yards south of the northeast corner of said lot of land No. 124; thence due west, across said lot of land, to the west line thereof; thence north to the land of the estate of J. J. Hill; thence east 76 3/4 yards; thence north 115 yards, to line of Ben Easom; thence east 143 1/2 yards; thence south 315 yards, to dividing line of Jesse Easom and Mattie Lou Easom; thence east, to the east line of lot No. 125; thence due south, to point of beginning--sixty (60) acres of said land lying in lot No. 125 and five (5) acres lying in lot No. 124. She remained in possession of said lands until January 1, 1923, such possession being continuous from the date of said deed. On December 27, 1922, the Citizens' Mercantile Company obtained a judgment against said Mrs. Easom, in the city court of Blakely, of Early county, for $327.08 principal, $31.61 as interest thereon to the date of judgment, $35.86 as attorney's fees, and $13.85 as costs of court. Execution regularly issued on this judgment on December 27, 1922, and was on the same day duly recorded on page 75 of General Execution Docket No. 3 in the office of the clerk of the superior court of Early county.
On the day that this execution issued the said Mrs. Easom owned and was in possession of the lands above described, but the Bank of Donalsonville held two certain security deeds, passing title to said land into them, over said land, each of said security deeds being executed by Mrs. Easom to said bank, the one dated November 15, 1921, recorded on November 30, 1921 in Mortgage Book SS, page 401, in said clerk's office, and the other dated December 10, 1921, recorded on December 21, 1921, in the same book in said office, on page 411 of said mortgage book. The first of said
security deeds was given to secure an indebtedness of Mrs. Easom to the bank of $224.86, and the latter an indebtedness of $102.50. Neither of said security deeds has ever been canceled of record, and neither of them has ever been presented to the clerk of the superior court of Early county for the purpose of having it canceled of record. Each of said security deeds bears two entries indorsed on the back thereof, which entries were all made by I. R. Aultman, assistant cashier of the Bank of Donalsonville, on the dates they purport to have been made. Said entries are as follows on each deed: 'The debt secured by this deed being paid, cancellation of same is hereby authorized. This 28th day of March, 1923. Bank of Donalsonville (Donalsonville, Ga.), I. R. Aultman, Asst. Cashier. Georgia, Seminole County. On March 28, 1923, Otho Easom paid Bank of Donalsonville the debt secured by within deed, requesting that we enter cancellation on same. Now, on September 10, 1923, comes Otho Easom with the original papers, without exercising cancellation of same, and now requests us to transfer same to him, as request for cancellation was asked by him in error, and that what he desired was a transfer, he having paid the debt to us. Now, for value received on March 28, 1923, we to-day transfer the within deed to Otho Easom, with all rights and privileges, as well as the land therein conveyed, without recourse on us. This September 10, 1923. Bank of Donalsonville, by I. R. Aultman, Asst. Cashier. Witnesses: Jos. P. Howard, H. G. Rawls, N. P.'
That on August 24, 1923, said above-described land was levied on by S.W. Howell, deputy sheriff of Early county, under and by virtue of the execution above described in favor of the Citizens' Mercantile Company against Mrs. R. A. Easom, said land being levied upon as the property of said Mrs. Easom. That I. R. Aultman, cashier of the Bank of Donalsonville, a corporation, on the 28th day of March, 1923, and continuously since that time, and that the assistant cashier of said bank had authority to receive for said bank any money due it, and to mark any security deed held by said bank, or in which said bank was grantee, paid or satisfied, and to authorize the cancellation thereof for said bank, and to make transfers of security deeds held by said bank."

The claimant testified as follows:

"On March 28, 1923, I paid the Bank of Donalsonville the full amounts due it by my mother, Mrs. R. A. Easom, who is the same person as Mrs. Emma Easom; said amounts being represented by notes secured by two certain security deeds. These two security deeds are those described and referred to in the agreed statement of facts in this case. The money I thus paid the bank was my own. I had a farm that my father had given me, and I put it in the 'long loan' and borrowed money on it. I paid off the security deeds of my mother's at the Bank of Donalsonville with part of the proceeds from this 'long loan' I had made on my own farm. As soon as I paid these two security [deeds] off, I went into possession of the land described in the security deeds, and have been continuously in possession of it ever since that time. My mother and I knew that the two security deeds to the bank had to be paid; and my mother told me that, if I wanted to pay them off, I could have the land described in the security deeds; that she did not think that any of the other children would object. My mother and I did not have any agreement that, if I paid the bank the amounts due it under these two security deeds, I could have the two deeds transferred to me; nor did I have any agreement with the bank at the time I paid the two deeds off, nor prior to that date, that I should have the two security deeds transferred to me. However, it was satisfactory with my mother and with the bank that I pay them off. My mother did not ask me to pay the security deeds off, but told me that, if I did pay them off, I could have the land described in them. My mother was with me when I paid them off at the bank's place of business in Donalsonville on March 28, 1923. As soon as I paid the bank, Mr. Aultman, the assistant cashier, to whom I paid the money, handed me the two security deeds; each having on it an entry he made at the time, reciting that they had been paid. After I took possession of the land the Citizens' Mercantile Company had it levied on under their fi. fa. against my mother. Subsequently I carried the two security deeds to the bank, and had Mr. Aultman, the assistant cashier, make new entries on the back of the deeds for the purpose of having them transferred to me by the bank. With the exception of the entry of filing on the back of each of these deeds, these two entries are the only entries that appear on the back of each of said deeds."

At the conclusion of the evidence, and after argument, the judge found the property not subject, and the plaintiff excepted to this judgment and assigns error thereon, on the ground that it was contrary to the evidence and the law.

W. L. Bryan, of Donalsonville, and Lowrey Stone, of Blakely, for plaintiff in error.

H. G. Rawls, of Donalsonville, for defendant in error.

HINES, J. (after stating the facts as above).

Mrs Easom, the...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT