Citizens' Ry. Co. v. Craig
Decision Date | 28 May 1902 |
Citation | 69 S.W. 239 |
Parties | CITIZENS' RY. CO. v. CRAIG.<SMALL><SUP>1</SUP></SMALL> |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from district court, McLennan county; Marshall Surratt, Judge.
Action by Miss Hortense Craig against the Citizens' Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Clark & Bolinger, for appellant. L. W. Campbell and Felix D. Robertson, for appellee.
This is an action by the appellee against the street railway company for damages arising from personal injuries alleged to have resulted through the negligence of one of the motormen operating one of the cars on defendant's line, in permitting the same to come in collision with the car upon which the plaintiff was riding, thereby violently and with great force throwing her against the floor, by reason of which she sustained injuries. The facts, briefly stated, are as follows: The appellee was a passenger on one of appellant's street cars, the same being crowded; and, there being no vacant seats, she was standing up, holding onto the back of one of the seats, when, without warning, another street car on appellant's road collided with and ran into the car upon which the plaintiff was riding, with such force as to throw her to the floor of the car, whereby she received a terrible knock on the head, and severe flesh bruises about the hips and limbs, and by reason of which, also, her back was injured, she was not able to walk without a limp for about two weeks, and suffered with continual pains in her head for at least two months after the accident, and, as a result, had some trouble with her right ear, which has continued up to the time of trial, with some defect of hearing. There followed the accident a difficulty in swallowing, with soreness in the throat, and her eyes have troubled her since then. And further on, upon the subject of her injuries, she testifies: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. Travis
...7 Tex. Civ. App. 443, 27 S. W. 752 (w. e. refused); El Paso Elec. Co. v. Harry, 37 Tex. Civ. App. 90, 83 S. W. 735; Citizens' Ry. Co. v. Craig (Tex. Civ. App.) 69 S. W. 239 (w. e. refused); Dallas C. E. St. Ry. Co. v. Broadhurst, 28 Tex. Civ. App. 630, 68 S. W. 315 (w. e. refused); Galvesto......