City of Apalachicola v. State
Decision Date | 15 April 1927 |
Citation | 112 So. 618,93 Fla. 921 |
Parties | CITY OF APALACHICOLA v. STATE et al. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Proceeding by the city of Apalachicola to validate a bond issue, in which J. S. Murrow and others intervened. From a decree refusing to validate the bond issue, the city appeals.
Affirmed.
Syllabus by the Court
Valid local or special laws concerning powers of particular municipalities prevail as against general statutory law. Where there are valid local or special laws relating to the powers and government of particular municipalities that are in conflict with the general statutory law, such local or special laws prevail.
General law regulating local improvements applies, except where local law is inconsistent therewith, in which case local law must be followed (Sp. Acts 1915, c. 7128, Acts Ex Sess. 1925, c. 11396; Acts 1923, c. 9298; Const. art. 3, § 24). Where a general law provides supplemental, additional and alternative methods to be pursued to procure local improvements in municipalities, such general law is applicable except where, as in this case, a local law is inconsistent with the general law, in which case the local law must be followed; and this results not from a rule of construction, but from the express provision of our Constitution.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Franklin County; E. C Love, judge.
R. Don McLeod, Jr., of Apalachicola, for appellant.
W. J. Oven, of Tallahassee, for appellees.
The appellant instituted a statutory proceeding to validate a bond issue of that municipality in which it was shown that the proceedings had to authorize the issuance of the bonds sought to be validated were in pursuance to and in accordance with the provisions of chapter 9298, Laws of Florida (Acts of 1923). It is shown that the city of Apalachicola was incorporated under the provisions of chapter 7128, Laws of Florida (Acts of 1915); that article 7 of the charter act authorized the city commission to pave, grade, curb, lay out, open, repair, or otherwise improve any street, alley, or highway or part thereof, etc., and authorized the city commission to assess one-fourth of the cost of such improvement against the property abutting on either side of the street, alley, or highway so improved. Article 8 authorized the issue of bonds by the city commission with the approval of the majority of the registered voters of the city residing therein who own real estate therein and who have paid their taxes for the year last due thereon and actually voting; bonds to bear such rate of interest as may be deemed best by the commissioners, not exceeding the legal rate of interest in the state, for the purpose, among other things, of opening, widening, constructing, and paving the streets and sidewalks of the city, and this act provided:
Chapter 11396, Acts of Extraordinary Session of the Legislature of 1925, amended articles 7 and 8 of the charter act in part as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
West v. Town of Lake Placid
...446, 17 So. 581), and even if chapter 11855, supra, would otherwise be applicable (see State v. Avon Park (Fla.) 118 So. 223; City of Apalachicola v. State, supra), the cannot be sustained as to these bonds. The Charter Act, §§ 3-H and 48, expressly authorizes the town to acquire and mainta......
-
American Bakeries Co. v. Haines City
... ... and government of cities and towns so commanded by the ... amendment. See State v. Alsop, 120 Fla. 628, 163 So ... 80; State v. Jones, 121 Fla. 216, 163 So. 590; ... State v. Emerson, 126 Fla. 576, 171 So. 663 ... Burr, 79 Fla. 290, 84 So. 61; ... City of St. Petersburg v. Pinellas County Power Co., ... 87 Fla. 315, 100 So. 509; City of Apalachicola v ... State, 93 Fla. 921, 112 So. 618; Abell v. Town of ... Boynton, 95 Fla. 984, 117 So. 507; West v. Town of ... Lake Placid, 97 Fla. 127, ... ...
-
State Ex Rel. Gibbs v. Couch
...that the special charter provisions will prevail. See Broward v. Garrison Inv. Corp., 121 Fla. 45, 163 So. 212; City of Apalachicola v. State, 93 Fla. 921, 112 So. 618; Wade v. City of Jacksonville, 113 Fla. 718, 152 197; Ex parte Perry, 71 Fla. 250, 71 So. 174; State v. City of Miami, 101 ......
-
Sparks v. Ewing
...bonds do not violate any express or implied provision of the Constitution in force when the bonds were issued. In City of Apalachicola v. State, 93 Fla. 921, 112 So. 618, the proceeding was to validate bonds which had not yet issued by the municipality, and the construction required by sect......