City of Bowman v. Gunnells, 56493

Decision Date07 November 1978
Docket NumberNo. 56493,56493
Citation251 S.E.2d 39,148 Ga.App. 27
PartiesCITY OF BOWMAN v. GUNNELLS et al.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Lavender, Lavender & Phelps, Robert W. Lavender, Woodrow W. Lavender, R. Chris Phelps, Elberton, for appellant.

Davis, Davidson & Hopkins, Jack S. Davidson, Jefferson, Walter James Gordon, Hartwell, Kenyon, Hulsey & Oliver, Julius M. Hulsey, Gainesville, Erwin, Epting, Gibson & McLeod, Eugene A. Epting, Athens, Richard W. Story, Gainesville, for appellees.

DEEN, Presiding Judge.

This court granted the City of Bowman's interlocutory appeal from the trial court's denial of its motion for summary judgment. After examination of the record, it appears that the appeal was improvidently granted because there is an issue of fact as to whether the city created a nuisance when it failed to replace a light bulb which had burned out behind a red reflector in a traffic light after it had notice that the light was malfunctioning.

Appeal dismissed.

SMITH and BANKE, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • City of Bowman v. Gunnells
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • June 20, 1979
    ...Athens, for appellees. JORDAN, Justice. We granted certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in City of Bowman v. Gunnells, 148 Ga.App. 27, 251 S.E.2d 39 (1978) which held that there was an issue of fact "as to whether the city created a nuisance when it failed to replace a ......
  • Howard v. American Southern Ins. Co., 56480
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • November 7, 1978
  • City of Bowman v. Gunnells, 56493
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 6, 1979
    ...Epting, Athens, Richard Story, Gainesville, for appellees. DEEN, Chief Judge. The prior holding of this court in City of Bowman v. Gunnells, 148 Ga.App. 27, 251 S.E.2d 39 (1978), has been reversed on certiorari by the Supreme Court 243 Ga. 809, 256 S.E.2d 782 (1979). The prior judgment in t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT