City of Detroit v. Rabaut, 15
| Decision Date | 27 April 1973 |
| Docket Number | No. 15,15 |
| Citation | 389 Mich. 329,206 N.W.2d 625 |
| Parties | CITY OF DETROIT, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mary M. RABAUT, et al., Defendants-Appellees. |
| Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
Michael M. Glusac, Corp. Counsel, Ronald R. Sogge, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Detroit, for plaintiff-appellant.
Travis, Warren, Nayer & Burgoyne by John M. Roche, Detroit, for defendants-appellees.
Before T. M. KAVANAGH, C.J., and BRENNAN, T. G. KAVANAGH, SWAINSON, WILLIAMS, LEVIN and COLEMAN.
The City of Detroit, pursuant to its long standing practice, brought proceedings in Recorder's Court for the City of Detroit to condemn certain real property in that City.
The defendants moved to dismiss the proceedings on the grounds that Recorder's Court had no jurisdiction to try condemnation cases, and the trial judge granted their motion.
We granted leave to appeal prior to decision by the court of appeals because we are persuaded that the question of whether Recorder's Court has jurisdiction to try condemnation cases is of considerable importance and urgency.
The Constitution of 1963 provides: Art. 6, § 1)
'The judicial power of the state is vested exclusively in one court of justice which shall be divided into one supreme court, one court of appeals, one trial court of general jurisdiction known as the circuit court, one probate court, and courts of limited jurisdiction that the legislature may establish by a two-thirds vote of the members elected to and serving in each house.'
Recorder's Court is one of those courts of limited jurisdiction which the legislature established. It is a 'municipal' court and a 'court of record', but so describing it does not define its jurisdiction.
In 1857, when Recorder's Court was established in its present form by 1857 P.A. 55 (Chapter VI) it was given original and exclusive jurisdiction of all crimes, misdemeanors, and offenses committed within the corporate limits of the City of Detroit except 'in cases cognizable by the police court of the City of Detroit, or by the justices of the peace of said city', and expressly granted the power and jurisdiction of a circuit court In like cases. It was also given condemnation jurisdiction (Chapter VII) in connection with the opening, altering and closing of streets.
The Charter of 1883 (1883 Local Act 326) which continued the Recorder's Court, continued its criminal jurisdiction in specific language but did not mention any condemnation jurisdiction. Thus the Charter of the City of Detroit ceased to be the source of condemnation jurisdiction for Recorder's Court in 1883.
In that same year, however, just before the new Charter was granted by the legislature, Recorder's Court was given condemnation jurisdiction...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Chiropractic Council v. Com'R Fin. & Ins.
...76 Mich. 358, 367, 43 N.W. 310 (1889). It is conferred on the court by the authority that established such court. Detroit v. Rabaut, 389 Mich. 329, 331, 206 N.W.2d 625 (1973). Const. 1963, art. 6, § 1 established the current judicial system in Michigan, and Const. 1963, art. 6, § 28 provide......
-
Reed v. Yackell, Docket No. 126534. COA. No. 4.
...[Citation omitted.] Subject-matter jurisdiction is conferred on the court by the authority that created the court. Detroit v. Rabaut, 389 Mich. 329, 331, 206 N.W.2d 625 (1973). Const. 1963, art. 6, § 1 created the current judicial system in Michigan; it provides for one Supreme Court, the C......
-
Brody v. Deutchman (In re Rhea Brody Living Trust)
...created the court." Reed v. Yackell , 473 Mich. 520, 547, 703 N.W.2d 1 (2005) (CORRIGAN, J., dissenting), citing Detroit v. Rabaut , 389 Mich. 329, 331, 206 N.W.2d 625 (1973). The probate court is a court of limited jurisdiction and derives its power from statutes. Manning v. Amerman , 229 ......
-
Hodge v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
...jurisdiction, such jurisdiction must be 499 Mich. 228 “conferred upon [the court] by the power which creates it.” Detroit v. Rabaut, 389 Mich. 329, 331, 206 N.W.2d 625 (1973). Jurisdiction accordingly “arises by law,” and a court must, notwithstanding a party's stipulation, consent, or waiv......