City of Hollywood v. Bair

Decision Date13 February 1957
Citation93 So.2d 60
PartiesCITY OF HOLLYWOOD, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Florida, et al., Appellant, v. John H. BAIR, individually, and d/b/a Bair Plumbing Company, a sole proprietorship, et al., Appellees.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Judson A. Samuels, Hollywood, for appellant.

Jake I. Watson, Robbins & Cannova and Arthur, J., Franza, Hollywood, for appellees.

THOMAS, Justice.

This litigation was started 10 January 1956 by a group of individuals, corporations, and associations who are engaged in or interested in the plumbing business in the city of Hollywood. The plaintiffs prayed for a decree declaring Sec. 23 of Ordinance No. 1387 invalid and enjoining the city from issuing permits to septic tank contractors to do certain work defined in the ordinance.

After a thorough hearing the chancellor granted a permanent injunction and this appeal followed.

In the preamble to the ordinance, which was adopted 2 August 1955 as an emergency measure, it was stated that in obedience to a mandate of the people, a sanitary sewer system 'for various and sundry sections' of the city was under construction and that it was necessary to promulgate rules regulating the connecting of the sewer lines of existing homes with the new system. The ordinance contains twenty-six sections setting up a sanitary code and dealing generally with condition under which the system could be used and connections with it made.

There is no occasion to detail the many provisions of the ordinance as the attack was concentrated on Sec. 23. It was provided in that section that all work of connecting existing drains with the new sewers should be done by duly registered plumbers, but that during the first year of operation of the system this work could be performed by 'any person, firm or corporation licensed in the City' to install septic tanks. There were two exceptions: (1) connections made with cast-iron soil pipe were required to be made by licensed plumbers, and (2) the main drains of buildings, the construction of which was begun after the new system came into use, were required to be installed by licensed plumbers.

Under Sec. 469.01, Florida Statutes 1955, and F.S.A. no one can engage in the business of plumbing, in cities of 7,500 population or more, without a certificate, and by Sec. 469.05, Florida Statutes 1955, and F.S.A., cities in that category are required to establish rules regulating plumbing and such work is forbidden unless a permit is issued authorizing it.

The purpose of Sec. 23, supra, was to give septic tank contractors, who themselves must qualify to do their work, the right to make connections with the sewer system and unquestionably its enactment was motivated by the enormity of the task of switching the sewage from 3,200 houses using septic tanks to the new sewer system within the 90 days fixed by the ordinance as the period within which the change-over was required to be made, computed from the time the new sewer line became accessible.

As the appellant points out Chapter 469, Florida Statutes 1955, and F.S.A., contains no definition of 'plumbing' and as the law places upon municipalities of a stated population the duty of promulgating rules, it seems logically to follow that these municipalities may be the establishment of such rules define the business activities to which they apply. If the word 'plumbing' is given a definition too broad, it might, as appellant suggests, embrace even the laying of trunk and lateral lines and, certainly, it would not be reasonable to hold that contractors engaged in that work had to be qualified plumbers.

The able chancellor came to the view the appellee now advance. He recited the certification by the Bureau of the Census, 19 May 1955, that Broward County had a population of 159,052 according to the returns of a special census taken about 7 April 1955. This was the census taken to determine if the population was such that the appointment of additional circuit judges was authorized. He then referred to Chapter 29633, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1955, F.S.A. § 26.16(2), containing the provision that 'The official count of the population of the counties of Broward and Palm Beach [the counties comprising the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit where the census was being taken to determine whether additional judges could be appointed under Sec. 45 of Article V of the Constitution, F.S.A.] as made and taken in the year 1955, or subsequent years thereto, whichever census is the last, by the Federal Bureau of the Census, or the Commissioner of Agriculture of the State of Florida, as certified to the respective Boards of County Commissioners of said counties, is hereby provided for and shall be the official census of the inhabitants of each county.' (Italics supplied.)

The chancellor concluded that Sec. 553.12, Florida Statutes 1955, and F.S.A., pertaining to the exclusion of certain counties from its operation having been amended in 1955 to provide for exclusion 'according to the last official census,' and the special census having been declared an official one, Broward County, in which Hollywood is situated, therefore, came under the act which is called "Florida plumbing control act of 1951" F.S.A. § 553.01 et seq. and the definition of plumbing appearing in that act applied, so the septictank tank contractors were engaged in plumbing without qualifying as plumbers. And the chancellor further applied the sanitary code adopted in accordance with Chapter 381, Florida Statutes 1953, and F.S.A., because of the provision in Sec. 553.06, that 'Chapter VIII of the Florida state sanitary code * * * is hereby adopted as the state plumbing code and all installations * * * to plumbing shall * * * be performed in accordance...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Jones v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 3423
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 5 Junio 1963
    ...such ordinances, including the instant ordinance. The chancellor relied largely on the Florida Supreme Court case of City of Hollywood v. Bair, Fla.1957, 93 So.2d 60. The appellants allege that the Bair case is not controlling, and rely heavily upon the case of City of Coral Gables v. Seife......
  • Jones v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 32930
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 8 Julio 1964
    ...'[T]his question is not present in this appeal and we do not by our holding in this case, pass upon it, directly or indirectly.' In the Bair case 3 we held simply that persons licensed to install septic tanks who passed an examination as a prerequisite to installing such connections and who......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT