City of Kansas v. Kansas City, Topeka & Western R.R. Co.
Decision Date | 31 October 1884 |
Citation | 84 Mo. 410 |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Parties | THE CITY OF KANSAS v. THE KANSAS CITY, TOPEKA & WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY et al., Appellants. |
Gardiner Lathrop and Pratt, Brumback & Ferry for appellants.
D. S. Twitchell for respondent.
The City of Kansas instituted a proceeding to condemn a strip of land twelve feet wide, east and west, and thirteen hundred and twenty feet long, north and south, in order to widen to that extent Liberty street, which runs north and south. Of this strip five hundred and five feet belonged to the appellant railroad company, and six hundred and forty-nine feet to the elevator company, upon which said railroad company had a railroad track, and the balance of the strip was owned by the West Kansas City Land Company. The proceeding was had, in the first instance, before the mayor, and was appealed to the circuit court, where, on a trial de novo, witnesses were introduced who estimated the value of the land, one at four dollars per front foot, two at five dollars, one at five dollars, but he thought that it was worth to the railroad four times that amount. The jury went upon the land and examined it, and assessed the damages to the railroad company at $1512.50, and assessed it for benefits six hundred and twenty-one dollars. The damages to the elevator company were assessed at sixteen hundred and twelve dollars, and it was assessed for benefits three hundred and twenty-four dollars. The land company was allowed for damages four hundred and fifteen dollars, and assessed one dollar for benefits. The instructions to the jury are not complained of, but it is strenuously contended that the jury disregarded the evidence and instructions in assessing the damages.
The instructions are as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kansas City v. Jones Store Co.
...only about three-fourths of its property was taken. Kansas City v. Smart, 128 Mo. 272; St. Louis v. Brown, 155 Mo. 567; Kansas City v. Railroad, 84 Mo. 410; Kansas City v. Baird, 98 Mo. 215; Kansas City v. Bacon, 147 Mo. 279; Kansas City v. McTernan, 308 Mo. 494; Shoemaker v. United States,......
-
Kansas City v. Jones Store Co.
...only about three-fourths of its property was taken. Kansas City v. Smart, 128 Mo. 272; St. Louis v. Brown, 155 Mo. 567; Kansas City v. Railroad, 84 Mo. 410; City v. Baird, 98 Mo. 215; Kansas City v. Bacon, 147 Mo. 279; Kansas City v. McTernan, 308 Mo. 494; Shoemaker v. United States, 147 U.......
-
Washington Sav. Bank v. Butcher's & Drovers' Bank
... ... from St. Louis City Circuit Court. -- Hon. L. B. Valliant, ... ...
-
In re Proceedings to Open and Widen Oak Street
...98 Mo. 218; Kansas City v. Bacon, 147 Mo. 259; Kansas City v. Morton, 117 Mo. 446; Corrigan v. Kansas City, 211 Mo. 608; Kansas City v. Railroad Co., 84 Mo. 410. Ragland, J. This controversy grows out of a proceeding to widen and extend a street under the provisions of the Charter of Kansas......