City of Marshalltown v. Forney

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Iowa
Writing for the CourtDAY
Citation61 Iowa 578,16 N.W. 740
Decision Date03 October 1883
PartiesCITY OF MARSHALLTOWN v. FORNEY.

61 Iowa 578
16 N.W. 740

CITY OF MARSHALLTOWN
v.
FORNEY.

Supreme Court of Iowa.

Filed October 3, 1883.


Appeal from Tama circuit court.

Block No. 10, in the city of Marshalltown, is composed of 12 lots, of which six front upon a street on the north, and six front upon Main street on the south. Through this block an alley runs east and west. Another alley, 16 1/2 feet wide, also extends north and south through this block between lots 3 and 4, and 9 and 10. The defendant owned two 20-feet building lots on the west and one on the east of this last-named alley, said lots having a depth of 180 feet. Forney caused to be represented to the city council that he would build a large and commodious opera-house, in connection with stores, upon these lots, at a cost of from eighteen to twenty thousand dollars, if the city would vacate the alley and allow him to use it for an entrance-way to the opera hall. He also caused to be presented to the council the plan of the ground floor of a building, prepared by one Ellis, an architect, covering his three 20-feet lots and the alley, and extending back the whole depth of the lots, being 76 1/2 feet front and 180 feet deep, with two store-rooms in front,

[16 N.W. 741]

west of the alley, and one east of the alley, and a circular opera-room in the rear, with large stage, the entrance to the room being over the alley. This building, Ellis represented, could be erected for from $18,000 to $20,000. The property owners in block 10 signed a paper stating that they were in favor of the vacation of the south half of the alley in said block for the purpose of erecting an opera-house thereon, and entrance thereto, and maintenance thereof. Thereupon, on the twenty-third day of December, 1878, the city council adopted an ordinance as follows:

“An ordinance vacating the alley in the south half of block No. 10 of the original town of Marshall, on conditions:

Section 1. Be it ordained by the city council of the city of Marshalltown, that the alley described as follows, to-wit, the alley running north from Main street in the middle of block No. ten, (10,) of the original town of Marshall, to the alley running east and west through said block, be, and the same is hereby, vacated, only upon the express conditions hereinafter following and expressed: That Henry Forney, his heirs or assigns, build and erect, within one year and six months from the passage of this ordinance, and maintain forever, an elegant and commodious opera-house, of the value of at least twenty thousand dollars, upon the adjacent lots and on said alley, and shall use said alley for said opera-house and for an entrance-way thereto, and for no other use or purpose, and shall pay all taxes and charges that may be hereafter assessed against said alley so vacated, municipal or otherwise.

Sec. 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force only after its publication, and written acceptance of Henry Forney of the conditions thereof, filed in the city clerk's office within thirty days of its publication; and upon his failure so to file such acceptance as aforesaid, within the said thirty days, then the above vacation and grant shall not become operative to vest any rights or privileges whatever.”

The defendant accepted all the conditions of this ordinance on the ninth day of January, 1879. Subsequently the defendant was informed by Mr. Foster, a competent architect, that it would cost $40,000 to erect a building covering the entire depth of the lots, with an opera-house in the rear. Finally he adopted a plan 56 1/2 feet front and 90 feet in depth, with two store-rooms below and music hall above, the entrance being over the alley. The plans and specifications were left at the mayor's office, in Marshalltown, for inspection, and he received bids for construction, and were there 10 days before the contract was let. The defendant entered upon the alley, and excavated it, in connection with his two lots, for a basement, and has erected thereon a handsome building, at a cost of about $16,000. In the second story he has constructed a large square...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 practice notes
  • Hubbell v. City of Des Moines, No. 30131.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Iowa
    • October 2, 1915
    ...streets and alleys, but to devote them thereafter to other than public purposes. See, also, City of Marshalltown v. Forney, 61 Iowa, 578, 16 N. W. 740;Harrington v. Railway Co., 126 Iowa, 388, 102 N. W. 139;Lake City v. Fulkerson, 122 Iowa, 569, 98 N. W. 376;Walker v. City of Des Moines, re......
  • Jacobs v. Miller, No. 50366
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Iowa
    • November 14, 1961
    ...portion of Adams Street established. That the city had the power to vacate the street on condition see, City of Marshalltown v. Forney, 61 Iowa 578, 16 N.W. From the testimony of Mr. Reyner, one of the defendants, we are warranted in Page 678 finding Pangborn's Second Addition was filed Oct......
  • Louden v. Starr, No. 29553.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Iowa
    • October 2, 1915
    ...that the city may vacate public streets or alleys and devote the same to private use. See City of Marshalltown v. Forney, 61 Iowa, 578, 16 N. W. 740;Harrington v. Railway Company, 126 Iowa, 388, 102 N. W. 139;Lake City v. Fulkerson, 122 Iowa, 569, 98 N. W. 376; and Walker v. City of Des Moi......
  • Freeman v. City of Centralia
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Washington
    • February 6, 1912
    ...one.' Matter of the Mayor, 28 A.D. 143, 52 N.Y.S. 588. A like holding was made in the case of Marshalltown v. Forney, 61 Iowa, 578, 16 N.W. 740: 'Now, if the vacation of a street puts an end to the public use, it certainly cannot affect the power of the city to vacate that the vacation was ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
15 cases
  • Hubbell v. City of Des Moines, No. 30131.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Iowa
    • October 2, 1915
    ...streets and alleys, but to devote them thereafter to other than public purposes. See, also, City of Marshalltown v. Forney, 61 Iowa, 578, 16 N. W. 740;Harrington v. Railway Co., 126 Iowa, 388, 102 N. W. 139;Lake City v. Fulkerson, 122 Iowa, 569, 98 N. W. 376;Walker v. City of Des Moines, re......
  • Jacobs v. Miller, No. 50366
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Iowa
    • November 14, 1961
    ...portion of Adams Street established. That the city had the power to vacate the street on condition see, City of Marshalltown v. Forney, 61 Iowa 578, 16 N.W. From the testimony of Mr. Reyner, one of the defendants, we are warranted in Page 678 finding Pangborn's Second Addition was filed Oct......
  • Louden v. Starr, No. 29553.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Iowa
    • October 2, 1915
    ...that the city may vacate public streets or alleys and devote the same to private use. See City of Marshalltown v. Forney, 61 Iowa, 578, 16 N. W. 740;Harrington v. Railway Company, 126 Iowa, 388, 102 N. W. 139;Lake City v. Fulkerson, 122 Iowa, 569, 98 N. W. 376; and Walker v. City of Des Moi......
  • Freeman v. City of Centralia
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Washington
    • February 6, 1912
    ...one.' Matter of the Mayor, 28 A.D. 143, 52 N.Y.S. 588. A like holding was made in the case of Marshalltown v. Forney, 61 Iowa, 578, 16 N.W. 740: 'Now, if the vacation of a street puts an end to the public use, it certainly cannot affect the power of the city to vacate that the vacation was ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT