City of Mascotte v. Florida Mun. Liability Self Insurers Program

Decision Date01 December 1983
Docket NumberNo. 82-1765,82-1765
Citation444 So.2d 965
PartiesCITY OF MASCOTTE, Appellant, v. FLORIDA MUNICIPAL LIABILITY SELF INSURERS PROGRAM, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Jacqueline R. Griffin, Orlando, Robert E. Austin, Jr., Leesburg, and William H. Stone, Clermont, for appellant.

Lamar D. Oxford of Dean, Ringers, Morgan & Lawton, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing a motion for supplemental relief in a declaratory judgment action filed under Section 86.061, Florida Declaratory Judgments Act. Because the relief requested was sought after adjudication of the principal action for declaratory relief (and, in fact, after an appeal in that action) we agree with the trial court that the motion was filed too late.

The principal action involved the appellee seeking declaratory relief regarding its duty to defend under its insurance policy with appellant. The insurer alleged it had no duty to defend and the insured countered by saying the insurer had a duty to defend. Thus, the issue before the trial court was a clear-cut interpretation of the policy. The city lost. It took an appeal. It lost again. The courts said the insurer had no duty to defend because the insurance policy should be interpreted that way.

Now the city is attempting to come back into court and allege a reformation of the contract. Its new allegations include a claim that the city was misled into believing there would be coverage and even though the policy may not say there was coverage that the insurer should provide it any way. The rationale urged is that the insurer said there would be coverage before the policy was issued, the city bought the policy with that assurance and the insurer cannot deny that coverage even though the policy omits it.

That matter should have been brought to the trial judge in the original suit. The relief sought is in the nature of a counterclaim and under these circumstances is a compulsory counterclaim. A compulsory counterclaim is one which must be raised by a defendant in the original suit or he will be forever barred from raising it. It is a defendant's cause of action arising out of the same transaction or occurrence as the plaintiff's action. Here the original suit was on the contract, an interpretation of it. The supplemental relief sought is also on the contract, a reformation of it.

In Florida there is no caselaw on point but in Colorado there is. See Atchison v. City of Englewood, 180 Colo. 407, 506 P.2d 140 (1973). We disagree with the Colorado...

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • American Annuity v. Guaranty Reassurance, No. C-1-95-454.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Ohio
    • 18 Abril 2001
    ...is in reality a compulsory counterclaim and would ordinarily be barred under Florida law. See Mascotte v. Municipal Liab. Self Insurers Program, 444 So.2d 965, 966 (Fla.Dist.Ct. App.1983) ("It is in the interest of all litigants and the courts in cases where a dispute over a contract exists......
  • Puff 'n Stuff of Winter Park v. Fed. Trust Bank
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Florida
    • 8 Noviembre 1996
    ...claim." E.g., Yost v. American Nat'l Bank, 570 So.2d 350, 352 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1990) (citing City of Mascotte v. Florida Mun. Liab. Self Insurers Program, 444 So.2d 965, 966 (Fla.Dist.Ct. App.1983), rev. denied, 451 So.2d 847 (Fla. 1984)). A similarly longstanding axiom is that the compulso......
  • In re Int'l Oil Trading Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of Florida
    • 8 Febrero 2016
    ...counterclaim?Montgomery Ward Dev. Corp. v. Juster, 932 F.2d 1378, 1381 (11th Cir.1991) (citing Mascotte v. Florida Municipal Liability Self Insurers Program, 444 So.2d 965, 966 (Fla.App.1983) ; Yost v. American National Bank, 570 So.2d 350, 352 (Fla.App.1990) ). An affirmative answer to any......
  • St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. Welsh
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 7 Enero 1987
    ...v. Florida Municipal Liability Self Insurers Program, 444 So.2d 965 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), review denied, 451 So.2d 847 (Fla.1984). The Mascotte court addressed the issue of compulsory counterclaims and adopted the transaction or occurrence test set out in Roberts v. National School of Radio ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT