City of Michigan City v. Austin
Citation | 442 N.E.2d 705 |
Decision Date | 30 November 1982 |
Docket Number | No. 3-1281A330,3-1281A330 |
Parties | CITY OF MICHIGAN CITY, and Hazel Thomas, Ray Rowe, and James Gillen as Members of the Civil Service Commission for the Fire Department of Michigan City, Indiana, Defendant-Appellant, v. Allen L. AUSTIN, William Pishkur, et al., as Members of a Class of Plaintiffs, and International Association of Firefighters, Local # 475, Plaintiffs-Appellees. |
Court | Indiana Appellate Court |
William Janes, Michigan City, for defendant-appellant.
Richard A. Browne, Gordon A. Etzler, Hoeppner, Wagner & Evans, Valparaiso, James B. Clements, Michigan City, for plaintiffs-appellees.
On December 15, 1980 the Common Council of Michigan City enacted an ordinance creating a three member civil service commission to establish policies based on merit for the selection, promotion and discipline of Michigan City firefighters. On April 11, 1981 the International Association of Firefighters Local # 475 (Union) filed suit challenging the statutory validity and constitutionality of the ordinance. On April 30, 1981 the trial court granted a temporary restraining order prohibiting the city from taking any actions pursuant to the ordinance. Both the city and the union moved for summary judgment. On November 25, 1981 the trial court entered an interlocutory order holding the ordinance to be unconstitutional, void and unenforceable. On December 14, 1981 the city filed its assignment of errors and praecipe for appeal. On January 12, 1982, in accordance with Indiana Rules of Procedure, Appellate Rule 4(B)(5)(b), the Court of Appeals of Indiana accepted jurisdiction of this appeal upon the city's petition.
The appellant's first three assignments we restate as asking whether Michigan City had the statutory license to establish by ordinance a merit commission for the selection, promotion and discipline of city firefighters.
The trial court found:
The city asserts that "express enabling legislation" exists authorizing the creation of a merit commission by city ordinance. The trial court found to the contrary that the Board of Public Works had exclusive authority to regulate "all phases of the employment relationship of a firefighter and the city ...." and the ordinance therefore improperly impinged upon the board's statutory authority.
The city contends a proper interpretation of IC 18-1-11 (repealed) yields the statutory authority for the city's merit commission ordinance. It places particular emphasis upon IC 18-1-11-3(a)(2) (1980). We deem a review of IC 18-1-11-1 and IC 18-1-11-2 to also be appropriate.
IC 18-1-11-1 provides:
(Emphasis added.)
The union asserts the above emphasized portion of IC 18-1-11-1 declares the Board of Public Safety to be the exclusive arbiter over all matters of the firefighting force.
The powers of the Board of Public Safety are further delineated in IC 18-1-11-2:
(Emphasis added.)
We recently...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bailey v. Canan
...Cir. 1984)), cert. denied; State ex rel. Dunlap v. Cross, 403 N.E.2d 885, 886-87 (Ind.Ct. App.1980); cf. City of Michigan City v. Austin, 442 N.E.2d 705, 707-08 (Ind.Ct. App.1982) (applying same reasoning to fire fighters). Specifically, the Seventh Circuit has held that the language of Ind......
-
RICHMOND State Hosp. v. BRATTAIN
...the State is contractual. See, City of Terre Haute v. Brighton (1983), Ind.App., 450 N.E.2d 1039, 1040-1041; City of Michigan City v. Austin (1982), Ind.App., 442 N.E.2d 705, 714, reh. denied; Wencke v. City of Indianapolis (1981), Ind.App., 429 N.E.2d 295, 297, reh. denied; Foley v. Consol......
-
Richmond State Hosp. v. Brattain, 49A02-0908-CV-718
...See, City of Terre Haute v. Brighton (1983), Ind. App., 450 N.E.2d 1039, 1040-1041; City of Michigan City v. Austin (1982), Ind. App., 442 N.E.2d 705, 714, reh. denied; Wencke v. City of Indianapolis (1981), Ind. App., 429 N.E.2d 295, 297, reh. denied; Foley v. Consolidated City of Indianap......
-
Bernhardt v. State
...the State is contractual. See, City of Terre Haute v. Brighton (1983), Ind.App., 450 N.E.2d 1039, 1040-1041; City of Michigan City v. Austin (1982), Ind.App., 442 N.E.2d 705, 714, reh. denied; Wencke v. City of Indianapolis (1981), Ind.App., 429 N.E.2d 295, 297, reh. denied; Foley v. Consol......