City of Muskogee v. Wilkins

Decision Date01 October 1918
Docket Number8726.
Citation175 P. 497,73 Okla. 192,1918 OK 560
PartiesCITY OF MUSKOGEE et al. v. WILKINS.
CourtOklahoma Supreme Court

Syllabus by the Court.

The effect of section 8, art. 4, c. 173, Sess. Laws 1915, was to withdraw from local authorities generally the power to pass enforce, or maintain any ordinance, rule, or regulation imposing a pecuniary charge in the nature of a tax, license or permit for the use of the public highways by motor vehicles registered conformably therewith.

Section 581, Rev. Laws 1910, empowers municipal authorities to impose a license tax for revenue, as distinguished from a license fee collected on account of necessary police regulation.

The character of a city ordinance is to be determined primarily by all of its provisions, and where such ordinance purporting to be an exercise of the regulatory municipal police power, imposes a pecuniary charge, excessively disproportionate to the sum necessary to cover the expense of the municipality in the way of licensing, inspecting, and supervising an occupation, upon the payment of which one is authorized, as of right, to pursue the occupation, such charge is a tax for revenue, and not an exaction for the purpose of regulation.

A municipal ordinance attempting to impose an occupation tax on the owners or users of motor vehicles operated over and upon the public highways, though for hire, is in contravention of the provisions of the General Highway Act of 1915, and void.

Certain provisions of an ordinance of the city of Muskogee entitled "An ordinance providing for an occupation tax upon all persons engaged in the business of operating 'jitney busses,' and for the regulation and control of such business," examined, and held to impose a tax for revenue, in contravention of the provisions of the General Highway Act of 1915.

Equity will restrain by injunction proceedings to enforce a municipal ordinance attempting to impose an occupation tax upon the owners or users of motor vehicles run upon the public highways who have complied with the requirements of the General Highway Law of 1915, where such proceedings would destroy property rights and inflict irreparable injury.

The remedy afforded by the provisions of section 7, c. 107, Sess. Laws 1915, is not intended to cover cases where taxes for revenue are illegally attempted to be imposed and extortionately collected by municipal authorities from which all power to enact or enforce legislation relative to such taxation has been withdrawn.

Commissioners' Opinion, Division No. 3. Error from District Court, Muskogee County; Chas. G. Watts, Judge.

Action for injunction by C. M. Wilkins against the City of Muskogee and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. Affirmed.

Chas. A. Moon, of Muskogee (Gibson & Hull, of Muskogee, of counsel), for plaintiffs in error.

W. E. Disney, of Muskogee, for defendant in error.

BLEAKMORE C.

This proceeding in error is brought to review a judgment of the district court of Muskogee county enjoining the city of Muskogee and its officers from enforcing certain provisions of an ordinance imposing a monthly charge of $25 as an occupation tax upon the owner, lessee, or possessor of each motor vehicle carrying passengers for hire over a fixed route in the city.

The title and those provisions of the ordinance involved deemed pertinent to the present inquiry are as follows:

"An ordinance providing for an occupation tax upon all persons engaged in the business of operating 'jitney busses,' and for the regulation and control of such business.
Be it ordained by the council of the city of Muskogee, Oklahoma:
Section. 1. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation, either as principal, agent or employé, to operate within the corporate limits of the city of Muskogee any 'jitney bus,' or to act as driver or chauffeur thereof, without complying with the provisions of this ordinance, applying to such ownership, operation or to the position of driver or chauffeur thereof, or any of the regulations herein ordained.
Sec. 2. That a 'jitney bus,' as the term is used in this ordinance, is hereby defined to be any automobile operated over fixed routes within the city for the purpose of carrying passengers for hire.
Sec. 3. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation, either as owner, lessee or possessor in any right, to engage in the business of operating a 'jitney bus' without first obtaining a license therefor from the city clerk and complying with the following requirements: First. The payment of an occupation tax, which tax is hereby ordained to be as follows: For each 'jitney bus' operated by such person the sum of twenty-five ($25.00) dollars per month for each month such bus is operated. Such tax shall be payable monthly in advance, and no license shall be issued prior to the payment thereof. Second. Said license shall be renewed monthly by a payment of said monthly tax, and an indorsement by the city clerk upon said license of the renewal thereof for the following month."

The trial court found, among other things:

"That the plaintiff is engaged in operating a number of automobiles or motor vehicles, commonly known as 'jitney busses,' along designated routes and terminals and with regular schedules for hire in the city of Muskogee, and that he has been so engaged for more than one year last past.
The court further finds that said plaintiff has invested in said motor vehicles a large amount of money, and that he operates said motor vehicles by means of certain drivers, and that the business consists of carrying passengers to and from different parts of the city of Muskogee for a stipulated price.
The court further finds that plaintiff has complied with the statutes of the state of Oklahoma governing and regulating the licensing and taxing of automobiles, more particularly known as the General Highway Law, being chapter 173, art. 4, of the Session Laws of the Legislature of the state of Oklahoma of 1915; that he has paid the registration fees for each motor vehicle owned by him as required by said act; and that the department of highways of the state of Oklahoma has issued him a certificate of registration and a number plate which he has at all times displayed on the rear of the automobiles owned and operated by him. ***
The court further finds from the evidence that said ordinance, in so far as it attempts to require the payment of the sum of $25 per month per car, is excessive and confiscatory of the business of the plaintiff and confiscatory of the business of operating jitney busses in the city of Muskogee, Okl., and if enforced will compel the plaintiff and all other persons to quit the operating of jitney busses in the city of Muskogee.
It is therefore considered, adjudged, ordered, and decreed by the court that the defendants, and each of them, be and they are hereby perpetually restrained and enjoined from enforcing, or attempting to enforce, that provision of said ordinance providing for the payment, in advance, of the sum of $25 per month per car for each jitney bus operated in the city of Muskogee. To which order the defendants and each of them except."

The theory upon which the city seeks to maintain the ordinance in question appears by the following excerpt from its brief:

"The power to provide by ordinance for an occupation tax such as that prescribed by ordinance of the city of Muskogee, questioned in this cause, was granted by the Legislature to cities by section 581 of the Revised Laws of Oklahoma 1910, wherein it is provided: 'The city council shall have authority to levy and collect a license tax on *** drays, hacks, carriages, omnibuses, carts, wagons and other vehicles used in the city for pay.'
We think that it cannot be questioned that the tax in this case is levied upon the occupation of operating cars for hire and is not a tax upon the right to operate an automobile or to run it over the streets of the city."

By the General Highway Law (Sess. Laws 1915, c. 173, art. 4) it is provided:

"Sec. 3. *** The registration fees imposed by this article upon motor vehicles, other than those of manufacturers and dealers, shall be in lieu of all taxes general or local, to which motor vehicles may be subject as personal property under the laws of this state. ***
Sec. 8. Subject to the express provisions of this article, local authorities shall have no power to pass, enforce or maintain any ordinance, rule or regulation requiring from any owner to whom this article is applicable any tax, fee, license or permit for the free use of the public highways, or excluding or prohibiting any motor vehicle registered in compliance with this article from the free use of the public highways or the accessories used thereon, and no ordinance, rule
...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT