City of Norwood v. Burton

Decision Date06 September 2006
Docket NumberNo. 2005-2314.,2005-2314.
Citation2006 Ohio 4554,110 Ohio St.3d 416,854 N.E.2d 150
PartiesCITY OF NORWOOD, Appellee, v. BURTON et al., Appellants.
CourtOhio Supreme Court

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Norwood v. Horney, 110 Ohio St.3d 353, 2006-Ohio-3799, 853 N.E.2d 1115.

MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR, O'DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.

RESNICK, J., not participating.

To continue reading

Request your trial
173 cases
  • State v. Graham
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Ohio
    • December 17, 2020
    ......Garden City , 163 Mich.App. 562, 571, 414 N.W.2d 891 (1987). B. The admission of Mr. Massa's victim-impact ......
  • Wash v. Sublett
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Washington
    • November 21, 2012
    ...... City of Tukwila v. Garrett, 165 Wash.2d 152, 161, 196 P.3d 681 (2008); State v. Phillips, 65 Wash. ......
  • State v. Jones
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Ohio
    • December 6, 2012
  • People v. Mckinnon, S077166.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • October 12, 2011
    ...preclude appellate review for plain error of defendant's claim of erroneous Witherspoon/ Witt excusal], but see State v. Bethel (2006) 110 Ohio St.3d 416, 854 N.E.2d 150, 174–175 [despite general rule that, regardless of objection, record in criminal case will be reviewed for plain error af......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT