City of Scottsbluff v. Tiemann, 37463
Decision Date | 06 March 1970 |
Docket Number | No. 37463,37463 |
Citation | 175 N.W.2d 74,185 Neb. 256 |
Parties | CITY OF SCOTTSBLUFF, Nebraska, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Norbert T. TIEMANN, Governor of the State of Nebraska, Defendant. |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court
1. A statute is not to be read as if open to construction as a matter of course.
2. Where the words of a statute are plain, direct, and unambiguous, no interpretation is needed to ascertain the meaning.
3. It is not within the province of a court to read a meaning into a statute that is not warranted by the legislative language. Neither is it within the province of a court to read anything plain, direct, and unambiguous out of a statute.
4. A statute classifying cities for legislative purposes in such a way that no other city may ever be added to the class violates the constitutional provision forbidding special laws where general laws can be applicable.
5. Generally, a classification which limits the application of the law to present condition, and leaves no room or opportunity for an increase in the numbers of the class by future growth or development, is special, and a violation of Article III, section 18, of the Constitution of Nebraska.
6. When invalid portions of a statute are so interwoven with the rest of the act so that the act may not be operative with the void portions eliminated or where it is obvious from an inspection of the act that the invalid portion formed the inducement for the passage of the act, the whole act fails.
7. It is competent for the Legislature to classify objects of legislation and if the classification is reasonable and not arbitrary, it is a legitimate exercise of legislative power.
8. A legislative classification, in order to be valid, must be based upon some reason of public policy, some substantial difference of situation or circumstances, that would naturally suggest the justice or expediency of diverse legislation with respect to the objects to be classified.
9. Classifications for the purpose of legislation must be real and not illusive; they cannot be based on distinctions without a substantial difference.
Loren G. Olsson, Scottsblugg, for plaintiff.
Clarence A. H. Meyer, Atty. Gen., Mel Kammerlohr, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lincoln, for defendant.
Heard before WHITE, C.J., CARTER, SPENCER, SMITH and McCOWN, JJ., and SCHEELE and BOYLES, District Judges.
This is an original action instituted in this court and brought by the City of Scottsbluff alleging the unconstitutionality of an act of the 1969 Legislature which directs certain cites of the first class, falling within certain prescribed population limits, to establish, maintain, and financially support a municipal court. In addition, the petition asks that this court enjoin the Governor from appointing a judge to fill a vacancy on the purported municipal court in Scottsbluff, Nebraska.
The issues presented by the pleadings are solely issues of law. Proper analysis of the constitutional issues involved necessitates the thorough understanding of the pertinent provisions of the legislative bill as originally adopted and an analysis of its subsequent admendments. Legislative Bill 1293, which is the act in question in this case, as originally enacted on May 5, 1969, provided in part: (Italics indicate new language.)
From May 27, 1969, until the adjournment of the Legislature on September 24, 1969, this act was subjected to detailed and piecemeal amendments which is significant with relation to the constitutional issues raised herein.
Section 3 of L.B. 1293, which creates the court and sets its population classification was subsequently amended by L.B. 787 on May 27, 1969, changing the controlling federal consus standard from '1960' to 'most recent.' This section of the statute was subsequently amended on another subject but leaving the 'most recent' language intact. See L.B. 1089, on June 11, 1969.
Section 4 of L.B. 1293 provides for a judge of the municipal court created under section 3, the creation of which is based upon the population figures according to the 1960 federal census. On September 24, 1969, section 4 was amended by L.B. 1070. However, the amendment pertained only to the designation of commencement of the full term of office for such judge, and left untouched the reference to the '1960 federal census' as originally enacted.
Section 5 of L.B. 1293, with relation to salary, was amended by L.B. 853 on July 17, 1969, changing the amount of the salary and the reference to the federal census from '1960' to 'most recent.'
Section 6 of L.B. 1293, which was not amended, deals with the jurisdiction of the newly created municipal courts in certain first class cities Based upon the 1960 federal cansus.
Section 7 of L.B. 1293, which was not amended, provides for a method of appeal from the newly created courts, and again makes reference to those cities of the first class, Based upon the 1960 federal census.
The history of this legislation in chronological summary is as follows:
Approved Section Subject Final Passage by Governor Sec. 6 of L.B. Jurisdiction of court May 7, 1969 May 12, 1969 1293 Sec. 7 of L.B. Appeals from May 7, 1969 May 12, 1969 1293 court Section 3 of L.B. Creation of 1293 as court amended by Sec. 1 of LB 787 and May 27, 1969 May 28, 1969 reamended by Sec. 1 of LB 1089 June 11, 1969 June 13, 1969 Sec. 5 of L.B. Salary of July 17, 1969 July 24, 1969 1293 as judges amended by Sec. 1 of LB 853 Sec. 4 of L.B. Number of Sept. 24, 1969 Sept. 26, 1969 1293 as judges amended terms by Sec.6 of vacancies LB 1070
In this declaratory judgment action we hold that L.B. 1293 as amended is invalid on the grounds that it constitutes special legislation, in violation of Article III, section 18, of the Constitution of Nebraska, because (1) it creates a permanently closed class, and (2) it is totally arbitrary and unreasonable in its method of classification.
According to the 1960 federal census only 2 of the 22 first class cities in Nebraska, Grand Island and Scottsbluff, meet the population requirements set forth in the bill, of more than 13,000 inhabitants in a city situated in counties of more than 33,000 inhabitants. The class is thus permanently closed with respect to the provision for judges (section 4), the provision for jurisdiction (section 6), and the method of appeal from the municipal courts thus created (section 7). The law is unmistakably clear that a statute...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
MAPCO Ammonia Pipeline, Inc. v. State Bd. of Equalization and Assessment
...true that the Legislature may classify where reasonable ... it may not do so in an arbitrary manner. In City of Scottsbluff v. Tiemann, [185 Neb. 256, 266, 175 N.W.2d 74, 81 (1970) ], we specifically said: "It is competent for the Legislature to classify objects of legislation and if the cl......
-
Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. State Bd. of Equalization and Assessment
...true that the Legislature may classify where reasonable ... it may not do so in an arbitrary manner. In City of Scottsbluff v. Tiemann, [185 Neb. 256, 266, 175 N.W.2d 74, 81 (1970) ], we specifically said: "It is competent for the Legislature to classify objects of legislation and if the cl......
-
Haman v. Marsh
...totally arbitrary and unreasonable method of classification, or (2) by creating a permanently closed class. See City of Scottsbluff v. Tiemann, 185 Neb. 256, 175 N.W.2d 74 (1970). UNREASONABLE The term "class legislation" is a characterization of legislation in contravention of Neb. Const. ......
-
State ex rel. Douglas v. Nebraska Mortgage Finance Fund
...local and special legislation. Dwyer v. Omaha-Douglas Public Building Commission, 188 Neb. 30, 195 N.W.2d 236; City of Scottsbluff v. Tiemann, 185 Neb. 256, 175 N.W.2d 74. Statutes which are reasonably designed to protect the health, morals, and general welfare do not violate the Constituti......
-
§ III-18. Local Or Special Laws Prohibited
...permanently closed class and by being totally arbitrary and unreasonable in method of classification. City of Scottsbluff v. Tiemann, 185 Neb. 256, 175 N.W.2d 74 Amendment extending time for appeal under section 77-510, R.R.S.1943, after appeal time had expired violated this section. In re ......
-
§ III-18. Local Or Special Laws Prohibited
...permanently closed class and by being totally arbitrary and unreasonable in method of classification. City of Scottsbluff v. Tiemann, 185 Neb. 256, 175 N.W.2d 74 (1970). Amendment extending time for appeal under section 77-510, R.R.S.1943, after appeal time had expired violated this section......
-
Neb. Const. art. III § III-18 Local Or Special Laws Prohibited
...permanently closed class and by being totally arbitrary and unreasonable in method of classification. City of Scottsbluff v. Tiemann, 185 Neb. 256, 175 N.W.2d 74 Amendment extending time for appeal under section 77-510, R.R.S.1943, after appeal time had expired violated this section. In re ......
-
§ III-18. Local Or Special Laws Prohibited
...permanently closed class and by being totally arbitrary and unreasonable in method of classification. City of Scottsbluff v. Tiemann, 185 Neb. 256, 175 N.W.2d 74 Amendment extending time for appeal under section 77-510, R.R.S.1943, after appeal time had expired violated this section. In re ......