City of Snyder v. Cogdell
Citation | 342 S.W.2d 201 |
Decision Date | 11 November 1960 |
Docket Number | No. 3598,3598 |
Parties | CITY OF SNYDER, Appellant, v. D. M. COGDELL, Sr., Appellee. |
Court | Court of Appeals of Texas. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas |
W. W. Park, Snyder, for appellant.
Gene L. Dulaney, Snyder, R. M. Wagstaff, Abilene, for appellee.
The City of Snyder on June 28, 1960, brought an action in the District Court for an injunction against D. M. Cogdell, Sr. It was alleged that Cogdell, in violation of the zoning ordinance of the City, on or about May 24, 1960, began the construction of a business building within the City without first obtaining a permit. The City prayed that the court issue a temporary injunction commanding Cogdell to cease erecting and constructing the building and that upon a final hearing the injunction be made permanent. After notice and hearing, the court entered judgment denying the petition for a temporary injunction. The City of Snyder has appealed.
Appellant presents one point of error in which it is urged that the court erred in denying the temporary injunction because the undisputed evidence showed that Cogdell was erecting and constructing a building within the City of Snyder without having first obtained a building permit as required by the zoning ordinance. The only violation complained of by appellant is the failure of Cogdell to obtain a permit. The evidence shows that the plans of the building fully comply with the requirements of the Building Code and the Zoning Ordinance.
The material portion of the City ordinance was introduced in evidence, and provides that:
(Emphasis ours.)
Appellant contends that it was entitled to an injunction as a matter of law under Article 1011h of Vernon's Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, which provides in part as follows:
'In case any building or structure is erected, constructed, reconstructed, altered, repaired, converted, or maintained, or any building, structure, or land is used in violation of this Act or of any ordinance or other regulation made under authority conferred hereby, the proper local authorities of the municipality, in addition to other remedies, may institute any appropriate action or proceedings to prevent such unlawful erection, construction, reconstruction, alteration, repair, conversion, maintenance, or use, to restrain, correct, or abate such violation, to prevent the occupancy of said building, structure, or land, or to prevent any illegal act, conduct, business, or use in or about such premises.' (Emphasis ours.)
The granting or refusing of a temporary injunction is ordinarily within the discretion of the trial court, which, although not unlimited, will not be disturbed on appeal unless the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
City of Fort Worth v. Johnson
...legislative discretion, and enforcement or nonenforcement of the ordinance is not a matter of judicial discretion. City of Snyder v. Cogdell, Tex.Civ.App., 342 S.W.2d 201, no writ history, cited by Respondents, does not hold to the contrary. In that case the City was not seeking to enforce ......
-
City of Dallas v. Gaechter
...by the trial court in reaching its decision as to what would be appropriate action for the court to take. City of Snyder v . Cogdell, 342 S.W.2d 201, 203 (Tex.Civ.App.--Eastland 1960, no writ) . This holding is supported by Texas case law dealing with mandatory injunctions. A mandatory inju......
-
Salt Lake County v. Kartchner
...Mercer Island v. Steinmann, 9 Wash.App. 479, 513 P.2d 80 (1973).3 Article 1101h of Vernon's Revised Civil Statutes of Texas.4 Texas Civ.App., 342 S.W.2d 201 (1960).5 8A McQuillin, Municipal Corporations (1965, Rev.Vol.), Section 25.344, pp. 478--9.6 17 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations (196......