City of St. Joseph v. Geiwitz
Decision Date | 21 February 1899 |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Parties | CITY OF ST. JOSEPH v. GEIWITZ et al. |
Appeal from circuit court, Buchanan county; H. M. Ramey, Judge.
Proceeding by the city of St. Joseph to condemn land for a street. Exceptions of Gottlieb Geiwitz and another (two of the defendants) to the report of the commissioners were overruled, and the motion for a new trial denied, and they appeal. Affirmed.
This is a proceeding instituted by the city of St. Joseph, a city of the second class, under the provisions of an act of the general assembly of the state of Missouri entitled, "An act in relation to the condemnation of private property for public use in cities of the second class," approved March 28, 1893 (Laws 1893, p. 62), for the purpose of opening and extending Seventeenth street, in that city. After passing an ordinance in pursuance of the act, the city presented its petition to one of the judges of the circuit court of Buchanan county, in vacation; and thereupon a summons was issued, which was duly served, notifying defendants that, on a day therein named, commissioners would be appointed to assess the damages and benefits to their property which was sought to be condemned for, or damaged by reason of, the extension of said street. The commissioners were duly appointed, and made their assessment and return, without notice to the property owners, or without giving them any opportunity to be heard before them. By this report the damages and benefits were assessed in gross to each individual owner, but afterwards an amended report was filed, making the assessments separately. To this amended report defendants Gottlieb Geiwitz and Emeline E. Loan filed exceptions. The exceptions were overruled, and the report of the commissioners approved. After unsuccessful motion for a new trial, Geiwitz and Loan bring the case to this court by appeal.
John Doniphan and Jas. F. Pitt, for appellants. Casteel & Haynes, for respondent.
BURGESS, J. (after stating the facts).
While it is stated in the brief presented on the part of the defendant Loan that but two grounds are insisted upon for a reversal of the judgment, namely, that the act of 1893 is unconstitutional; and, second, that the commissioners proceeded without giving the defendants an opportunity to be heard on the question of damages, they are substantially but one and the same question, — that is, that the law is unconstitutional, because it makes no provision for notice and hearing before the commissioners, and therefore is taking private property for public use without due process of law, within the meaning of section 30, art. 2, Const. Mo. After the service of the summons issued upon the petition...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Demay v. Liberty Foundry Co., 30153.
...shall remain inviolate. This contention cannot be maintained. K.C. Sub. Belt Ry. Co. v. Ry. Co., 118 Mo. 617; St. Joseph v. Geiletz, 148 Mo. 210; 35 C.J. 148, 149; Grand Trunk Western Ry. Co. v. Industrial Com., 291 Ill. 167, 125 N.E. 748; Adams v. Biscuit Co., 63 Okla. 52, 162 Pac. 938. (2......
-
State ex rel. State Hwy. Comm. v. Baumhoff et al., 23599.
...l.c. 437; Newby v. Platte County, 25 Mo. 258; City of St. Louis v. Buselaki et al., 80 S.W. (2d) 853, l.c. 857; St. Joseph v. Geiwitz, 148 Mo. 210, l.c. 217, 49 S.W. 1000; State ex. rel. v. Day, 47 S.W. (2d) 147, l.c. 149. (2) Instruction No. 12 correctly stated the measure of damages and i......
-
State ex rel. and to Use of Conran v. Duncan
... ... Jester v ... Spurgeon, 27 Mo.App. 477; Cloud v. Pierce City, ... 86 Mo. 357; Hyde v. Curling, 10 Mo. 359; Gibson ... v. Chouteau's Heirs, 45 Mo. 171 ... many other instances in our practice and procedure. St ... Joseph v. Geiwitz, 148 Mo. 210; Mound City Land & Stock Co. v. Miller, 170 Mo. 240. The justice, ... ...
-
De May v. Liberty Foundry Co.
... ... Rehearing Overruled March 31, 1931 ... Appeal ... from Circuit Court of City of St. Louis; Hon. Moses N ... Sale , Judge; Opinion filed January 5, 1931; motion for ... K. C ... Sub. Belt Ry. Co. v. Ry. Co., 118 Mo. 617; St ... Joseph v. Geiletz, 148 Mo. 210; 35 C. J. 148, 149; ... Grand Trunk Western Ry. Co. v. Industrial Com., ... ...